Laser-cut monocrystalline cells shaped into custom polygons

Oct 28, 2026 Last reply: 17 hours ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

Most people who need odd-shaped photovoltaics either live with rectangular modules or scribe cells by hand and hope for the best. Travis Howse took a different route, using an 80-watt laser tube to cut monocrystalline silicon cells into custom polygon shapes. The stated goal is a circular array inside a machined aluminium and glass enclosure for a long-lasting electronic device.



The cutting happened in an enclosed machine with a honeycomb bed, labeled VEVOR. Settings were six passes at 70 percent power, and every cell was cut from the back side. The cut lines follow the fine grid pattern on the front, since crossing that grid risks diagonal cracking at 45 degrees along the crystal grain. The method is score first, then snap by hand: localized heat contracts the backing into a slight V-shaped bend that steers the break. A scored wafer reportedly came apart neatly with fingers alone.



Details worth noting: the pieces show a blue front with silver grid fingers and busbar segments over a white backing, and a small commercial module sat on the bench as a comparison. The plan calls for a circular cutter to slice a circle into six strips, soldered into an array targeting 3 volts open circuit.



Two things remain open. It is not confirmed whether lapping the cut edges on a diamond file would clear the heat affected zone; the maker worried about shorting a cell and had lapping lined up as a contingency. There is also a speed discrepancy: the written description gives 50mm/s while the narration says 50 mm/min. A wiki work log update was promised but had not yet appeared.



Project by Travis Howse. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


Cutting from the back side seems like the cleverest single choice here. The grid fingers and busbar sit on the front, and the localized heat contracts the backing into that slight V-shaped bend that guides the snap. In my view that trades a little scorch on the rear face for a clean break and an untouched active surface.

What cutting speed was actually dialed in? I keep coming across two figures for the same job, 50mm/s and 50 mm/min, and at six passes per line that difference would change the heat input quite a lot. Did the maker ever say which number was the right one?

There is no confirmed answer on that. The written description gives 50mm/s, while the spoken narration states 50 mm/min, and the two figures simply conflict. What does seem agreed is the rest of the recipe: six passes at 70 percent power on the 80-watt tube.

One concrete improvement worth suggesting: check each piece electrically as it comes off the bed. Measuring current before and after every cut would show how much damage each pass causes, since current per area is the only real test. Forcing 1A through a finished strip and reading the voltage drop would also catch a poor joint or hidden crack before the six strips get soldered into the circular array.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required