Reusable Electrical Connector between Electronics Package and Flexible Sensor Substrate

Mar 23, 2007 2 Replies

Dear all,



I was wondering if any of you knows about commercial connectivity solutions that enables to make an electric connection between an electronics package and a flexprint. The requirements are:



- mechanical robust and stable



- solderless and glueless



- electronics should be reusable, i.e. the connector can be opened and closed many times



- 2 electrical contact are needed



- not bulky



I was personally thinking about some conductive velcro or a clamp that punches some pins through the flexible substrate film.



Any kind of suggestions, links, etc. are welcome!



Thx, David



Elastomeric connectors are normally used for this. Your flex would have two or more registration holes that engage [mechanical, passive] pins on the connector. Then you clamp down a locking bar on top of the flex circuit, pressing it onto the elastomer. The other end of the elastomer presses on the PCB tracks.

Your use of Usenet http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:VEjFh2CPNC4J:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet+follow-Usenet-customs-and-*-rules+*-a-service-for-*-*-*-*+hide-the-fact-*-*-*-they-are-*-on-Usenet+concerns-*-*-*-*-about-the-Google-interface+zzz+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-is-now-legendary+qq-qq+Google-cannot-muster-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* needs improvement. If you feel *compelled* to ask the same question in MULTIPLE newsgroups, *this* is the prefered technique: http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:qHhBKJ-sXKYJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-post+adequately.answered+corrected+with.commas+individually+Disclaimers+deductible+Newsgroups-line

Your technique

formatting link
is selfish and inefficient

The last half of this thread explains WHY and fleshes out the (more acceptable) cross-posting paradigm:

formatting link
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-appear+*-proper-answer-*-*-*-given+much-easier-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+*-frowned-on+*-correcting+*-Followup-To-*+*-*-_perfect_-*-*-*-*+*-*-*-too-lazy-*-*-*-*-*-appropriate-*+*-polite-*-mention-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+Just-because-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-does-not-mean-*-*-*-*-*-*+mark-*-*-*-*-all-*-groups+*-*-*-*-two-groups-*-*-aren't-*-different

The last post in that thread hints at why (clueless) Google Groupers are so reviled by those who read Usenet using a "newsreader".

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required