Replacement for HexSense FETSs

Hi, In the past, for some switching assemblies, I have on occasion taken advantage of the IR HexSense FET's. Big advantages at moderate currents of not needing an external sense resistor, at the 'cost' of needing an op-amp to generate a reasonably accurate current sense result, some drift on the high current units, and care needed in the software to 'tweak' for temperature effects. Typically using the IRCP250, at perhaps 20A. Now looking at redesigning a board I made some time ago, using these, and find that they are shown as 'Divested', by IR. They are available at present, but are obviously not the way to go for a new design. I found myself wondering what is being used to replace these?....

Best Wishes

Reply to
Roger Hamlett
Loading thread data ...

Roger, The hex since can be replaced by using the standard IRFP250 and a parallel fet of higher voltage such as the IRFU420 with a 100 ohm resistor in the source. Connect both drains together and connect both gates together. The current signal is taken at the connection of the 100 ohm resistor and IRFU420. The other end of the 100 ohm resistor is connected to the source of the IRFP250. Also the fancy negative supply is not needed with this connection because there is no concern about the signal current being diverted in the silicon of the IRCP250. It also is more accurate with no distortion at higher currents. Ray

Reply to
Ray King

Thanks. What suprises me, is that nobody seems to integrate such a solution though, the 'dual fet' solution, will be rather bulkier (there are already eight FET's along the heatsink, and while only four need current sensing, it may get a bit 'tight'... :-) Have to find something other than the IRFU420 though. These too are 'divested'. Oh well, a 'redesigning I will go'!.

Best Wishes

Reply to
Roger Hamlett

I do not know the specific situation with this part, but just the fact that it is "divested" does not necessarily mean that you will not be able to get it in the future. Semiconductor companies have been selling product lines and splitting companies in the last few years. National Semiconductor, Motorola, HP, and others have done this over the last few years. It is just a matter of whether whoever ends up with the rights to your part chooses to produce it. I have been in several situations where I thought a key part was not going to be available due to this practice, but so far I have always been able to find it from some successor or partner of the original. (I am watching this particular situation myself as I use a number of IR parts.)

Reply to
Gary Reichlinger

OK. Yes, I understand this practice (met it a lot, with TI parts in the past). The problem (of course), is that you have to 'assume the worst', unless the new manufacturer is already in place...

Best Wishes

Reply to
Roger Hamlett

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.