Hello, I'm looking for a linear (ratiometric) Hall effect IC that measure up to 5000 Gauss or so. Looking at Honeywell, Allegro, Melexis or Micronas I couldn't find something going above 2000 Gauss. I need at least a 3000 Gauss measuring range. The only product I know with such a range are obsolete and now very expensive product like KSY44 from infineon. The price of KSY44 is now about 10 USD and we can't afford these anymore. Thank you for any help. val
linear Hall IC up to 5000 Gauss ?
Oct 06, 2006
4 Replies
I think you might reconsider the problem. There are likely many ways to reduce the flux in the vicinity of the sensor itself that would not affect it's function as an accurate sensor of the relatively larger value that is available locally.
Getting repeatable results from one unit to the next has always been a matter of careful positioning. This would not change.
RL
That field value is above the range of permanent magnets, so most preamplified Hall effect devices won't have enough dynamic range; they are built with too much gain.
I've seen raw Hall sensors, but don't know any source of 'em in commerce. Have you considered magnetoresistive sensors instead? DigiKey has half-bridge sensors in that technology, part# AAV001-11 from NVE.
legg a =E9crit :
I agree but it is not that easy to reduce the B field while keeping the response linear. I think it is very difficult in fact, at least in my application which is a current transducer. We measure the intensity of B in four air gaps inside a magnetic core surrounding the cable where the current is to be measured. Moreover, it is not satisfactory to use a very sensitive cell and being forced to reduce the magnetic field. It is like reducing a signal and have it amplified. This would probably inject noise in the system. Thank you for your suggestion anyway
val
val a =E9crit :
Melexis have it in fact ! The part is MLX90251-0, and -0 is for option
0 which are for the less sensitive cells with ranges going up to 800 mT =3D 8000 Gauss. First time I read the datasheet I thought it was value in Gauss and didn't realized it was in mT.val
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required