"Joerg" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:F6brh.23737$ snipped-for-privacy@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... | Henry Kiefer wrote: | | > "Joerg" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:uharh.60462$ snipped-for-privacy@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net... | > | > | I also would have to make sure that whatever I use is either small or | > | > | available in MLF or similar. Can't get any big fat chip into this design. | > | >
| > | > The app note lists all devices in nice table with package type. | > | >
| > | | > | Yes, but it also needs to have no significant lead time. IOW, places | > | like Digikey should have it. We use that as a "weather forecast" for | > | availability. If they don't have something that's usually not a good sign. | >
| > Yes, that is a problem in general. I bought several hundred of the small ones and if a small one cannot fit I place two :-) | > (Something chinese people cannot do *lol*) | >
| > In Germany you can buy PSoC almost with distributors only. | >
| | I've lived there as well and that is what I never understood. Over here | you've got to offer much of your products through the places that are | used for prototyping. When I am done with a design my clients expect a | part list for the proto run that should ideally be all from one place. | Usually Mouser or Digikey. This is what some (large) EU mafg don't seem | to understand and why their design-in rate is now so low.
I don't think that you really don't know the answer: In Germany it is much more important you can say "I've done it", than "It was solved" ! So the natural answer is to provide a list of unique items then a general list focused on a single source to speed all up.
- Henry
--
formatting link