RF Meters - Cross posted - Page 2

Because at times I am working in front of them.




This has been suggested to me, hence my concern.




To gain expertise it helps if you start with asking a question.

Can you/anyone provide an answer?

:-P

The Nardalert XT or Radman XT is what you want, don't dick around with
anything else.

If you don't use it that often, you can even hire one:
http://www.allara.com.au/productinfo.aspx?prodid67 %

I am assuming that this is part of your employment? If so then the
company should pay whatever is needed to ensure your personal safety
on site. Talk to the OH&S people and kick up a stink saying you are at
personal risk and you need this device, money should not be an issue
here.

Dave.

I would like to know your thoughts about this device,

http://www.rsaustralia.com

Item number 129-189

TIA

:-P

That is an IONISING radiation detector, so bears no relevance to your
original question.

I still think you are a troll and a timewaster.

  nah you don't

Fantastic, if you plan on cleaning the windows of the Lucas Heights
Nuclear Reactor.

Dave.

Thanks guys, point taken.
BTW, I dont care if you think I am a troll Walt Davidson.
:-P

Its basically a geiger counter, used to detect nuclear radiation, not
radio/microwave frequency

A must have, if you are planning a trip to Chernobyl / Pripyat

    There are some very depressing photos of that deserted area at
http://www.panoramio.com/user/226142

Bob

athttp://www.panoramio.com/user/226142

Apparently makes some great motorcycle riding though:
http://www.kiddofspeed.com /

Dave.

Those arent my kids.

    I've heard of the 'nuclear family', but that's ridiculous....

An interesting article, if not somewhat disturbing in parts to think some
areas will still be "hot" in 2525.
Maybe the basis for a debate on keeping nuclear technology out of the hands
of idiots.

Cheers,
Alan

On Jun 27, 12:49 am, "Alan Rutlidge"


Indeed.
Not to mention that there is a finite supply of suitable Uranium
anyway. Pick your date in years, but it's less than 3 digits.
Renewable is the only long term answer.

Dave.

No need for debate, the facts speak for themselves

Down, boy |-)

athttp://www.panoramio.com/user/226142


That whole story is a hoax.

What, the Chernobyl disaster or the biker's story with the somewhat
convincing photos?

Cheers,
Alan

LOL, you have to ask? I may be known for being predisposed towards
conspiracy theories, etc.... but come on! :)
I meant the biker's story.

As I recall, she eventually admitted to it being more than a little
embellished after a number of people picked up on some inconsistencies
and factual errors. If you're sufficiently interested, do a search on
'Chernobyl biker hoax' or similar. There shouldn't be too much trouble
bringing up some relevant links.


Cheers

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/ockhamsrazor/stories/2007/1895697.htm

Click on "SHOW TRANSCRIPT"

Not sure about now, but back then it was possible to book a legitimate
tour to Pripyat. Travel was on four wheels.