Remember This Post ?

no you are full of shit



** Feb 20,  2007.


"  **  Anyone seen tonight's news ??

Our fuckwit pollies have all climbed on a VERY dodgy Greenie bandwagon with
this asinine idea.

Like that episode of  "Yes Minister" where Sir Humphrey explained the
mysteries of  " Politicians logic "  to the minister like this  .....

" Imagine a very serious problem has been identified  .....

So, WE politicians must do * SOMETHING *  about it and soon  !!!

NEXT:  along comes an idea that seems to be in the right direction ...

Immediately the worried pollies all howl in unison

THIS   * IS *   SOMETHING    !!!!!

Therefore  * WE *  must do it    !!!!      "

The plain truth is that CFLs consume enormously more energy in their
creation and distribution than the familiar incandescent bulb.

PLUS  - dead ones generate ENORMOUSLY more and far more  SERIOUS
environmental pollution than tiny bit of glass and burnt tungsten wire does.

PLUS  -  they are a absolute pig to dim.

PLUS  -  they generate harsh, fluorescent tube type light the nobody likes
in their homes.

PLUS -  they are often slow to light up which can be a serious safety hazard
in many situations.

Anyone care to add to the list of  NEGATIVE impacts ??

BTW:

Bet Leo gets all fired up.    "



** Well  -  the man has.

See the April 2007 edition  " Silicon Chip "  when it arrives.





......   Phil

Why should we. it was written by an idiot who goes crazy and is so
disturbed even electrons refuse to work for him.
Not only that but hasnt got an original idea in his brain.
Repeat. repeat. repeat.
All you do is rehash your own vomit.....


Phil Allison wrote: