When the monitors were released one year ago, the price difference between them was $200. It is understandable, because 204WT provided good colour because it had a newer LCD matrix developed by LG-Philips themselves, while 194WT had an older unremarkable matrix manufactured by AUO. I went to the local shop dealing in whitegoods, and they told me they ran out of 204WT's (they were so popular), only 194WT's were left.
LG L194WT (19", 1440 x 900) -- A$400 (US$350) LG L204WT (20", 1680 x 10500) -- A$600 (US$550)
However, the prices fell dramatically over the past year. Nowdays, you can buy 194WT in online shop for maybe A$220 (US$180), and 204WT for A $270 (US$220). I made an Internet search, and here the both models are offered for A$279 (US$230),
How come, 204WT is the same price as 194WT ? Are they (204WT) not much better than 194WT ? Or is it because LG made a switch, and now equips their 204WT with the inferior LCD matrices from Chunghwa (CPT) ?
I am sorry that I rashly bought a 194WT monitor. Should I get rid of it and get a (presumably) better 204WT ? (I am doing mostly FPS gaming).