Reception at a remote TV** has degraded and I thought maybe a splitter connection had gotten bad, even though they are all indoors.
No electronics stores in town anymore. Home Depot has normal ones but Google came up with
And my question is, 90db!!! I'd think it was a typo, but there's a picture of it and it says it in big letters. This is loss, right? Typical loss is 3.5db. With 90db loss, there's be almost nothing left.
Is this meant to fool suckers? Even if this were meant to fool suckers, would anyone even make a splitter with 90db loss? (It also says 2.4GHz)
(It also says this, twice in a row: "With this splitter being capable of frequencies up to 2GHz, there's no need to worry about signal loss or degradation of runs up to 100 ft.")
Also, I've thought about replacing the first amplifier too. It seems to be warmer than it used to be. IIRC it used to be just barely warm and now it's warm to the touch. Similar looking amps claim 20db and 36db and unspecified. Because of the splitter above, I'm suspeciaous that
36db might be phoney and actually no more than 20db. I can find the links if you want them.|--- 4 tvs in a row with an amplifier after the 2nd DVDR-[**]-| |--- 2 tvs in a row. Good reception at all 6 tv's except the
2nd one in this string.**a splitter to 1 tv and an amp to all the others.
This had all been working fine for over 30 years. The problem tv started giving problems a few years ago. Changing the tv didn't help. (All but one are 14" CRT tvs.)
Back to splitters,
1) Any reason to buy a gold-plated splitter? Outdoor use? 2) Besides the extra $2 charge, is there any reason to NOT buy a power-passing splitter if I'm not sending any power?