PbF policy China and USA ?

Line 6 Spider 3 amp with RoHS and PbF markings all over, date only 2008, no abusive use/speaker/lead problem. The boards are obviously PbF , white deposit as though been in a damp shed for 10 years. That is except for the interboard ribbon soldering. Boards populated and soldered in China with PbF solder and assembled in USA with leaded-solder or 2 flavours of PbF solder, one goes white easily and the other stays shiney? TDA7293 failed , going by burnt off lacquer on the minor trace between power - supply and signal - supply , then failure in signal half of the amp. Final failure was sub-ohm connection between +,- and output pin and about 40 ohm to ground. If there had been intermittant contact to a pin due to PBf , could that knock out a hybrid? Tugging on dropper Rs etc has not shown any so-elucidated poor joints on the rest of the board and no PbF part-ring cracks seen.

Reply to
N_Cook
Loading thread data ...

Unlikely joint failure at the pins as they are set in ring-barb hank bushes. Monolithic, not hybrid, I decided to crack this one open , not much to see other than smoke staining and strong smell of smoke.

Reply to
N_Cook

I reckon it was probably slack h/s clamp. Although not noticably loose on undoing, there is no permanent deformation of the silipad on this one (unlike its companion TDA). Clamp is 3:1 ratio cantilever U section steel, ratio the wrong way and no star washer or equivalent under the retaining bolt heads

Reply to
N_Cook

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.