How reliable are the old 'tin-can' encapsulated op-amps from say 40 years ago? I'm talking about the ones that look like large transistors and have typically 8 leads in the TO5-8 package. I'm unable to provide a part number as these don't have one as such. Could be a 741 perhaps but I can't be certain. Are they known to fail?
Many solid state devices from that era are still running. Physical damage (moisture working in via the leads) is one primary cause of failure. If the leads look good then chances are fairly good the device will work.
I use lots of 30 to 40+ year old components all the time for servicing our classic arcade games. Most are perfectly good. Other than electrolytic capacitors...they definitely have a shelf life/best before date!
John :-#)#
--
(Please post followups or tech inquiries to the USENET newsgroup)
John's Jukes Ltd.
MOVED to #7 - 3979 Marine Way, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5J 5E3
(604)872-5757 (Pinballs, Jukes, Video Games)
www.flippers.com
"Old pinballers never die, they just flip out."
The round top is an epoxy glob covering the die, which sits on the flat thick sheet material that holds the leads. 2 tone ones make this easy to see, all black ones not so much.
Those bring back not so fond memories. The black potting epoxy was optically transparent to infrared light. I had a hell of a time dealing with weird problems in the 1960's until I found the light sensitivity problem with those transistors. It took about a year for Fairchild to clear their inventory and screw their unsuspecting customers by continuing to sell these devices. Eventually, they changed over to the "PN" (TO-92) style package, which initially was made from silicon epoxy instead of epoxy-B. Silicon epoxy shrinks slightly at high temperatures, causing the corrosive fluxes from the wave soldering equipment to creep up the transistor leads by capillary action, and corrode the leads and chip. We had to x-ray the dead parts to determine the failure mode and guess the cause. It usually took about a month for the transistors to rot to death. I had a difficult time getting Fairchild to understand that having *ALL* the transistors on a PCB fail almost simultaneously after only a month was sufficient grounds for suspecting that something might be wrong with the parts. They eventually switched to epoxy-B, but only after again unloading their defective inventory on unsuspecting customers. There was also a problem with the UA2136 IF amp/detector IC, where chips made in different Fairchild factories produced radically different performance and stability. I took great pride in personally removing Fairchild from the approved vendor/manufacturers list, and finding alternate sources for about $2.5 million/year of their components. When I mentioned this to the sales rep, he acted like he didn't care or it wasn't important.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.