"Ol' Duffer" bravely wrote to "All" (22 Nov 05 19:53:40) --- on the heady topic of "Re: HDTV freq. allocations, converter box availability info?"
OD> From: Ol' Duffer OD> Xref: core-easynews sci.electronics.repair:349386
OD> In article , OD> snipped-for-privacy@aol.com says... > I for one am not happy the government is shoving this new television > standard down our throats. There was nothing wrong with our present > television broadcasting system that has worked so well for 60 years.
OD> As often happens with new technologies, I fear that it will be used OD> to make things more profitable rather than higher quality. More OD> specifically, the digital standard is capable of very high resolution, OD> but I bet a lot of broadcasters will instead use it for multiple OD> channels of poor quality.
OD> But there are technical advantages, like much more efficient spectrum OD> use letting broadcasters replace a roomfull of power-hungry class A OD> klystrons with an efficient solid state box not much bigger than a OD> microwave oven that covers the same square miles.
And there are disadvantages. For example, dx'ing will become near to impossible. Many of a station's audience lives out in rural areas without cable. A digital system is all or nothing without anything inbetween. In a rural setting a little snow in an analog signal isn't a big problem. However, a picture full of frozen squares or a blue screen is going to be a bitch to watch. No more tv for those folks. Satellite doesn't work so great in the fog or rain either.
A*s*i*m*o*v
... First Church of Binary Science (The Digitarians)