RF via fiberoptics

Not here to pester about own company - I do NOT work for this but just to share experience:

For antenna remoting, etc RF-over-fiberoptic we found

formatting link
is the best, somehwhat EXPENSIVE but tech specs are best in the world (noise, gain flatness, etc). As you know fiberoptic is the ONLY solution for LOSSLESS & SAFE transmitting RF over a long distance e.g. from antennas, on ship/aircraft, etc because first unlike Coax cable fiber doesn't suffer from excessive loss (you can have a 10-kilometer link no problem!), second it's hard to intercept (if you break fiber it iwll be notices, while Coax cable can be tapped in illegally), third it's immensely interference-immune, etc, etc. though mor eexpensive.

That we found perfcect for Antenna remoting when facilities cannot be built near each antenna (antenna array), also for spying/military application fiber is safer than coax cble, and finally on aircrafts, etc you would prefer fiberoptic due to its immunity to interference (life-safety issues). So

formatting link
I found by clicking on "components & assemblies" (NOT satellite comm)-->the clicked "fiberoptic products", they even posted datasheets and brochures there (maybe too much info!)

Reply to
Marco Licetti
Loading thread data ...

I call bullshit. It's easy to verify:

formatting link

If you're goung to spam, try not to look quite so stupid when you do it:

formatting link
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-appear+*-proper-answer-*-*-*-given+much-easier-*-*-*-*-what's-going-on+*-frowned-on+*-correcting+*-polite-*-mention-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+Just-because-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-does-not-mean-*-*-*-*-*-*+*-Followup-To-*+*-*-*-too-lazy-*-*-*-*-*-appropriate-*+*-*-_perfect_-*-*-*-*+*-*-*-*-two-groups-*-*-aren't-*-different

Reply to
JeffM

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.