If IBM is a real good supporter of OpenSource, i.e., GNU , then why cannot it expire all its software patents, and support in a real way. so clearly, its enjoying the benefits of Open Source and damaging all other companies, while supporting software patents which is the main opposition for GNU(Richard Stallman,
-a real open source developer.
Having been involved in computers and computer software since the early 60s, I find it very difficult to criticize IBM on the issue of 'open sourcing'.
The very early IBM PCs freely docmented the interface requirements for their computers, and thus founded an entire industry of 3rd party suppliers for graphics cards, audio cards, data acquisition cards, etc.
While their early computers were generally supplied with Microsoft operating systems, they were equally receptive to the instalation of alternative software, including Unix and various other software products.
In my view, GNU has a very serious internal problem if it has difficulty running on IBM iron, since no one else seems to have this problem. In fact, right now I'm running on an IBM clone using Windows XP Pro, on my secondary boot disk I have Red Hat Linux, which runs just fine.
Perhaps you would elaborate on the problems that you are having running GNU on IBM iron. Then too, considering that I've also had many problems running GNU software, perphaps it's simply a GNU faulty design problem? (Recall the problems GNU experienced several years back when advanced graphics/video cards began to be introduced).
Harry C.
Harry I think Sathishs point is that IBM sells software not just giving away all it's source, so that other companies can use it free of charge.
Charles
if u think other companies can use it free of charge, then whatz the use of GNU concepts which is established by the great man Mr.Richard Stallman. his main aim is to eradicate close source and software patents and codes should be free among developers or companies or any.. am i right ??
-sathish
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.