Hi, I see on Ebay cheap USB Cables(40-60USD) that claims to be compatible with the Xilinx ones. I don't understand wich one, if any, they emulate (DLC9G).
Do they work? Are they supported on latest webise under Win7 64bit? Wich cable they are compatible with?
TIA,
Giuseppe Marullo
PS: Two examples:
formatting link
and
PPS: Someone could please explain the 7 vs 6 pins thing?
They are clones of Xilinx USB-JTAG cables. The one I've had a look at was a clone of the DLC9G. The circuitry is a 100% clone, so the XIlinx SW cannot distinguish it from a real DLC9G. This means that it is 100% compatible with the Xilinx SW, including accepting firmware updates that Xilinx release from time to time. Unfortunately the build quality is much lower than the Xilinx original cables - the unit I examined worked just like an original until the USB A socket in it broke after a few cable insertion / removal cycles. This was repairable, but an annoying waste of time. Your mileage may vary.
Stephen Ecob Silicon On Inspiration Sydney Australia
Stephen, thanks for your answer. So they can be a [cheap] alternative, now the last question: what's up about the 6 vs 7 pin debate? Is it really needed? I see also a breakout board, does it make a difference? Thanks in advance.
I haven't checked but I am pretty sure that the Xilinx download agreement doesn't allow you to do this. After all they do say that you cannot use their
software to generate bits for anything other than a Xilinx part it would be out of character if they let you use their firmware upgrades for a competitors product.
BTW: where did they get the bits that are shipped with their probe? I'm sure they put together a crack reverse engineering team that was so good that it came out to be bit for bit identical to a rom dump of the xilinx product.
This isn't a technical question. It is a personal morality one.
John Eaton
--------------------------------------- Posted through
I use Altera USB Blaster clone from eBay for ~10USD. Works perfectly: drivers are exact the same as for original device, programming speed is also the same, but the best thing is that the clone is nearly 3-4 times smaller and has mini-USB connector.
Sometimes the reason that they can offer their product at such a discount is
because instead of paying a design team to create the product they simply copied straight from the original manufacturer. This is piracy and is nothing
more than stealing. I can get you a great price on an iPad if your willing to
ignore the fact that it is stolen and I am fencing it for pennies on the dollar.
Now there is a lot of overhead built into the prices from a large company. It
is quite possible to reverse engineer and create a "clean room" design that
functions the same but you can build and sell for a lot less money. The entire
ibm pc-clone market did this. I would want to see who designed this probe before buying. The guys that can do that stuff like to brag about it.
It is also possible that Xilinx never designed that probe and simply went to an OEM to rebrand one of their products. In that case you could get a better deal if you go straight to the source.
Either way I would want to know something about the manufacturer.
John Eaton
--------------------------------------- Posted through
Here is a $50 alternative that is supported by Xilinx. Support for this cable is built into ISE 13.2 and later, and previous versions by installing a plugin.
formatting link
In our testing at Avnet, we found this cable to be as fast or faster than the Platform Cable USB-II. This is especially noticeable when performing indirect Flash programming. You can order these cables online or through your local Avnet/Silica office.
Bryan, glad to know. Tomorrow I will be in Avnet/Silica to attend a free seminar near Milan on the little LX9 board, the board which has the most elusive documentation on the net (or off the net, because of the several broken links, or crashes even when attempting to register).
No, the Altera cable won't do Xilinx, but only because of software support. The Xilinx devices require a Xilinx cable clone which is also sold on eBay. I think I saw some for around $10 or so up to about $50 for the ones they say are "exact" duplicates of the Xilinx design.
I seem to remember that I've generated SVF files using Xilinx Impact which I've played back using urjtag and an Altera USB Blaster connected to a Xilinx FPGA.
Not a supported toolchain and no guarantee that it will work and not damage your devices...
Does this contain the same logic as the JTAG SMT1?
formatting link
I can use the Xilinx Platform Cable USB II with Impact (ISE 13.3), but I can't get the Digilent JTAG SMT1 to work. I just get a "Cable connection failed" error message.
Using lspci the Xilinx cable shows up as: Bus 002 Device 036: ID 03fd:0008 Xilinx, Inc.
And the Digilent JTAG SMT1: Bus 002 Device 060: ID 0403:6010 Future Technology Devices International, Ltd FT2232C Dual USB-UART/FIFO IC
Actually the 10 USD USB Blaster sold at ebay are not 100% perfect copy. In order to make a cheaper device they use a Cypress chip to emulate the FTDI+CPLD of the USB Blaster.
For a perfect copy you probably going to pay 30USD
Here is an example:
formatting link
Cya
--------------------------------------- Posted through
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.