Tektronix 2235 grief

Was given a Tek 2235, option 2 (what's that?) in decent shape, with one problem.

On both vertical channels, there is massive overshoot on rising edges on the .1 v/cm ranges and higher. The lower voltage ranges are fine.

Poking around inside, I found a little assembly, P/N 307-1013-00 that is labelled 10X and 100X . Apparently this assembly contains some compensating capacitors for the attenuator.

In any event, touching this assembly, exerting the slightest force in any direction clears up the problem, which quickly returns as soon as I remove the pressure. I don't think the problem is the switch contacts, as pressing down and wiggling the switch cam doesn't do much.

Does this sound familiar? and what is the recommended fix. I hate to start taking stuff apart "looking for trouble" so I figured I'd ask here first. Or, if you have a manual/schematic of the input section I'd appreciate that too.

Thanks to all in advance.

Reply to
BFoelsch
Loading thread data ...

IMHO: gather your friends at the top of a tall building, toss this "scope" as far as it will go.

Reply to
Ancient_Hacker

BFoelsch wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Perhaps a bad solder joint at the pin/substrate interface? Or a fractured SMD cap. I believe regular solder will not work here,but don't have any alternatives,either.Possibly some low-temp stuff like Chip-Quik may work without destroying the metallization on the substrate.

The other alternative is to find a replacement thickfilm. Sphere in Canada may have new parts for this,or cannabalize from a parts scope.

(I always wondered if one could make a small PCB using SMD resistors and caps instead of the ceramic thickfilm,to replace one of these.)

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Reply to
Jim Yanik

"Ancient_Hacker" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com:

Bad advice;the 2235 was a good scope.

2*3*35 was a lousy scope,though,worthy of your advice.
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Reply to
Jim Yanik

Well, opinions will vary. In my somewhat limited (about 6) experience:

  • The CRT is dim.

  • The SMPS transformer screeches.

  • A drop of Windex on the front panel and the 1-2-5 numbers on the vertical controls come sliding off.

  • There's often a burned PC board area under the cluster of 47 ohm resistors. Guess they speced the resistors too small at 1/2 watt.

  • The knobs feel loose and wiggly.
--
Personally I *love* the 2336 series.  Much brighter CRT and sturdier
built than the 22xx series.  If you can find one without a broken
hinge.
Reply to
Ancient_Hacker

"Ancient_Hacker" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:

Basically the same tube as a 465. Maybe whoever cal'd it didn't get the grid bias set right.

Perhaps a bad xfmr? In my experience,few 2235's had that problem;I can't recall any. Now the early 2213/2215's had that problem.

I've encountered that too.

Probably after TEK outsourced their plastic parts production. Somebody then got a "bright idea" to save money. These days,I'd use some PC graphics program to print a clear decal to replace the lettering.(those numbers would probably also run off with Windex.)

Vert output amp? If that's it,they changed it in the A model.(redesign) I solved it by using a bit longer leads and some stand-off on the replacements.

BTW,the PCB usually was not "Burned",just the solder mask discolored.

Well,the 2200 series was meant to be low cost,not a lab scope,nor 465 quality. BUT; TEK sold a LOT of them.

Chock full of TEK-made ICs that aren't available anymore,and difficult to service.Also had a lot of HV failures. Attenuator problems,too. I hated them.

BTW,the 2335 series was meant to be a "ruggedized" field-service replacement for the 465.(that's why it's sturdier) And TEK didn't sell many,except to the US military.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Reply to
Jim Yanik

Gee, I must have gotten the good one, the 2235 in question doesn't have ANY of the mentioned problems! I washed the front panel with "Mean Green" and it looks like new, with all the lettering intact.

I did find the original problem. I did not realize that the attenuator modules were in sockets! Pulling them out and cleaning up the pins solved the problem.

It looks like an OK scope, definitely in the field service category. I am truly amazed at how well the calibration has held up.

Thanks to all for your help.

Reply to
BFoelsch

Opt. 2 is AFAIR a change in the preregulator board (power supply).

..snipp..

I canibalized 7A18 that where otherwise unrepairable for these, or unrepairable 465 scopes. The x10 and x100 ceramics were useful for me, but of course it is some time effort necessary to bring parts in.

Was the method tof these times, Jim. You can find these a lot in instruments of this age. Nowadays, when you look for the 0.002 ct optimization, for a 60 to 100 MHz scope you would manufacture with PCB made in China.

hth, Andreas

Reply to
Andreas Tekman

"Andreas Tekman" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com:

I think you're wrong;IIRC,2235 had the pre-reg on the main board from the beginning. It was early 2213/15 that had the Opt.48 pre-reg PCB added,as the original triac pre-reg was noisy and failed a lot.

Well,I confess I had a "senior moment";NOW I recognize the p/n given as the common TEK hybrid attenuator modules used in 7K plug-ins and many 400 series scopes. DUH.....(smack forehead)

It's also possible that the module's pin sockets have some contamination or have lost their grip.(like my memory!) Perhaps a syringe injection of some alcohol would help here.

Thanks for the help.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Reply to
Jim Yanik

...snip...

hi jim, sorry when I did not make this point clearer in the posting. You are absolutely right about the change from a triac pre-reg to the MOSFET based prereg - as a later add-on, these unit got the option-ident "opt. 48".

What I wanted to say that where even more chnages in the later 2235 scopes, that already where factory equipped with the MOSFET prereg. AFAIR the later (or very late) changes where a "opt.2". But I am sorry, I am unable to remember now if it was in the prereg, 2nd stage power supply -- all is deep in my memo is the word power supply. Apologies if my memory is wrong.

:-)) No, injection to humans only makes the liver act faster, but you loose the experience of the taste of the drink . I cannot recommend the procedure ;-)

Always great to read here in the group about Tek scopes, I enjoy all your contributions and knowledge. Thanks a lot too.

Andreas

Reply to
Andreas Tekman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.