For the record, the application I'm trying to debug is written in assembler, so compiler compatibility is one problem I don't have to worry about. Of course it would be nice if the debugger could display my assembler source with all its labels and symbols, instead of hex addresses...
Rowan
--------------------------------------- Posted through
Google is your friend. Finding the following link too me all of 15 seconds:
In the future: Google first, post second.
In message , rowan.bradley writes
Then you do have to worry about which compiler.
Besides not all simulators handle anything other than a standard 8051.
Try the Keil that Will handle it.
-- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Those are emulators. Not simulators. They are also expensive. Also not all the emulators do a good job with the Dallas parts. They had a different core timing to most.
The Keil compiler/simulator is one of the few that will handle the Dallas range properly. The chances are the program was built with the Kiel tools (they had 80% of the 51 market and were close to Siemens)
-- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.