IAR v/s KEIL for 8051

Jun 30, 2005 12 Replies

Hi All,



I will be using 8051 based micro-controller for my project. I want to choose C complier for it between Keil and IAR. Anybody who has experience on these compilers please help me in doing this and share your experiences with these compilers. Let me also know any benchmarks, comparisons about the performances of these compilers.



Thank you.



Regards, Shailendra


Keil is an welll-integrated toolkit.Now its name is uVersion 2.Once I used SyncMOS 51 chipset to build a voice terminal. I think you can do everything in Keil uVersion 2, coding, compiling, debugging, managing your project file. There is one issue, when I use hardware emulator to debug , I can't debug in source code level because all the source code is invisible.

The performance of compiler, how to evaluate it? I think the code we design decide the performances.Ineffective code causes poor performance.

Maybe you can lookup 8051 microcontroller FAQ in

formatting link
it include detailed info.

Good luck

I used a version of IAR back around 1990, and a version of Keil around

1999. Based on that experience, I'd lean towards Keil, if given the choice. However, both products have advanced in the intervening years, and I don't think you'll go much wrong by choosing either one.

Regards,

-=Dave

Change is inevitable, progress is not.

Keil is now uVision 3. I highly recommend it. The built-in simulator is fantastic.

Scott

"Mehta Shailendrakumar" wrote in message news:da06l4$r72$ snipped-for-privacy@ns2.fe.internet.bosch.com...

Both are well thought of. IAR are notorious for restrictions such as; dongle required and a special code that takes a week to get, you don't buy the IAR compiler, you buy the right to use it ... meaning you can not resell it.

Keil is much less restricted and has put out a quality product for many years.

I have used Keil for the past two years and am quite pleased with it. I recommend spending the extra bucks and getting the uV3 IDE as well. I used to use the Keil tool set with Silicon Labs' IDE and it didn't work as well.

Bob

My Keil came with a dongle :-(

Five or six years ago, when I was using Keil 5.5, it did not have any use prevention, er, I mean "copy protection", but I heard complaints on usenet about the European version being dongled. You are apparently in England.

I don't know if the U.S. version is still dongle (and other impediment) -free, but if it is, that would be more than enough to recommend it above IAR, if IAR is dongled. Version 5.5 was more than "good enough," and I hear the newer versions are even better.

Regards,

-=Dave

Change is inevitable, progress is not.

I have version 7.50 (US) and there is no dongle or other impedimentia.

Very pleased with it, too...

Bob

snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com (Dave Hansen) wrote in news:42c545ae.670161500 @news.aioe.org:

The US version is still dongle free, and we have been extremely happy with it for developing 8051 code.

Richard

Keil and IAR are great tools, but have you considered alternatives?

formatting link
formatting link
Dunfield 8051 Tools

In article , AntiSPAM snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com writes

Not for serious work.

Keil recommend (or used to) this one for non-serious applications.

\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ /\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

As the "Technical Support" page doesn't seem to have been updated since their fax problems in March 2003, they might possibly not be the most responsive vendor on the planet. Maybe Ontario Telephone is still working on repairing the cut phone line?

Rich Webb Norfolk, VA

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required