I'm looking to create a portable stereo audio device. This system i exactly what I am looking for:
formatting link
However the evaluation and development tools are thousands of dollar which puts it out of reach. Can someone put me on the right path to similar solution where there are gcc tools available? Thank you.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
V
Vladimir Vassilevsky
You should look how to get the thousands of dollars first. If you are not worth thousand of dollars, you obviously not capable of developing a portable audio device.
VLV
C
Chris Carlen
Don't be discouraged by some folks' negative remarks.
If you first need to learn how to work with DSPs, then where you lack financial resources you will have to compensate with intelligence, careful research, and prudence. You will still need at least several hundred dollars to buy a typical evaluation kit, possibly nearing and exceeding $1000 to get some additional support items if needed like some cheap electronic test equipment (check into the use of PC sound cards though for spectrum analysis, etc.)
Start researching the DSP product offerings, evaluation kits, tools, 3rd party tools, and developer communities surrounding TI and Analog Devices DSPs. Get onto comp.arch.dsp . Also, look at Danville Signal and other vendors, who might have something to get you started in the sub-$1000 range. Carefully research what is available, and which product both will suit your intended application AND has available free or low cost tools that will allow you to bypass the need to purchase the manufacturer's full-blown development tools. This might force you to have to write assembly language at worst (although for ADI DSPs, might be rather easy-going), or to use gcc/gdb which isn't so bad (but still more painful than I can tolerate, but I can afford at least a few $1000s, even for hobby purposes.)
My DSP interest is in servo control, laser shows, and other fast real-time control stuff, so the TI TMS320F2812 and similar DSPs/tools have afforded me the ability to play with >100MIPS for well less than $1000.
This is different from actually producing a "portable audio product" in which case you need to create something manufacturable and cost effective. Then you will indeed need many $1000s.
Also consider if you can do what you want with something simpler than a DSP, like a cheaper ARM SBC, for ex.
Have fun.
Good day!
____________________________________
CRC
crobcREMOVETHIS@BOGUSsbcglobal.net
NOTE, delete texts: "REMOVETHIS" and
"BOGUS" from email address to reply.
J
Joerg
TI's DSP kits start at $99 but Joel wants to built something portable. Many regular DSP eat batteries as if they were popcorn.
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
J
Joel
What I'm doing doesn't have to be all that complex. It'll be on the orde of complexity of a voice changer. Is there a better digital option tha DSP?
I'm a student so the freer the better.
M
Martin Griffith
this might be useful, the docs are terrible
formatting link
and
formatting link
martin
L
Leon
terrible
formatting link
If you just want mono speech a dsPIC and Si3000 codec should do what you want. dsPIC development software is free.
Leon
U
Ulf Samuelsson
You can probably do what you want with an AVR32 (uC3B)
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
This is intended to be my personal opinion which may,
or may not be shared by my employer Atmel Nordic AB
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.