Seems
That suggests that it isn't photocurrent, all right. Could it be pickup from an electronic ballast? Does putting aluminum foil over the tape help?
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Seems
That suggests that it isn't photocurrent, all right. Could it be pickup from an electronic ballast? Does putting aluminum foil over the tape help?
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
It needs a tinfoil beanie! :)
l
DC
at
-Oh, It's fine as is. I just find it weird, somet'ing is triggering the zener. I 'smells' like a photon making electron hole pairs... shallow trap states? I need to know more about what's inside.
George H.
ound? =A0Seems
because
ng
ying some
ized the
sed
one
external
g, or
ave some
=A0With a
int the
ave
till
lDC
at
pt -
Yeah but the specturm is still pretty flat. No signs of some frequency. (on a Tek 'scope FFT))* And it was the same 60 Watt incandesent that caused the "through tape" leakeage. Pretty much DC with some nice gentle 120 on the top.
I was also thinking about some pinhole in the tape... but I've got two diodes, a pin hole in one, would make the amplitude asymmetric... no signs of that.
The front panel was being 'made pretty' today. But tomorrow, I can measure some numbers. (I should post a pic. The Audio Amp has a gain of eleven!)
George H.
*Which is pretty good at picking out siganls at the ~1% level... If you average and trigger near the tippy top of the noise.
around? Seems
because
some
realized the
external
or
some
With a
the
It's probably a pretty good thermometer.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
s around? =A0Seems
n't because
trying
d trying some
realized the
r-cased
call one
the external
thing, or
do have some
ng. =A0With a
y paint the
as
I have
le still
drical
in.
bit
=A0DC
In of at
red
n.
ickup
pe
text -
p has a
Opps, "Mystery Managed". Operater error... I've got a two sets of diode on the pcb. I had the wrong set covered with tape. The Zeners were still 'wide open'.
Moving the tape to cover the 'noise diodes' fixes the light sensitivity problem... Duh!
George H.
t -
around? Seems
because
trying
trying some
realized the
clear-cased
one
external
something, or
have some
With a
paint the
have
still
text -
That's the sort of thing that never happens without a large and appreciative audience. Been there.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
urces around? =A0Seems
e isn't because
ted trying
ioned trying some
he realized the
clear-cased
I recall one
use the external
something, or
hey do have some
ething. =A0With a
imply paint the
not as
when I have
while still
07)cap)
lated
lectrical
king in.
PIN
g a bit
no
ohm, =A0DC
p.
of
ing I
ation of at
i .er a
colored
sq in.
be pickup
e tape
ed text -
ean
o Amp has a
of
rs
Grin... I had this whole list of different experiments I wanted to try today.
Now I can do something productive.
George H.
t -
I hate when I do that... and it's not a rare occurrence.
Darn... I was thinking that it might be fun to investigate stuff in the IR range using your technique of masking the diodes with visually opaque tape that passed IR. A whole new area to check out...
Oh, well. Better luck next time.
BTW, after all this, I opted to just use software-generated noise for my brief experiment. I'll put together a hardware version that I'll likely use for testing circuits (amps and such).
Thanks again for all the great ideas. You guys sure taught me a lot about all this stuff - which I guess is the idea.
of
rs
Yup, I had an exciting morning driving in to work thinking about different things I might try... Then reality punches you in the nose.
Well it might not be a complete waste. I 'someday' want to make a variable noise source that shows how shot noise depends on the size of the electron. Current noise density i sub n =3D sqrt(2*e*I), (amps/sqrt Hz). Where I is the average current. So if you could turn a knob and make electrons four times bigger, (while keeping the average current the same.) Then the noise density would go up by a factor of 2. In my model this is exactly what's going in in the zener. With no light I get big pulses but not very often. With the light on you get less noise. Because an absorbed photon makes an e-h pair and this can cause the zener to discharge sooner than it would have without the photon. The average current is kept roughly constant by the zener bias resistor.
yDigital sources are nice, because (in theory) you should know exactly how much noise you are making.
George H.
Sounds interesting... never would have thought of it.
Personally, I don't feel most of my mistakes (in electronics) are a waste. If nothing else, I wind up learning something.
For example: I learned to make sure there's nothing between me and the door when I power up a circuit I've built. Also, try not to be the high- value resistor that discharges high voltage capacitors. There are endless opportunities for learning, if you don't incinerate yourself.
ts of
ners
ty
e t d yely
I just wanted to cross the final Zed on the 20V Zener noise source run off the +/-15 V power rails.
I had other circuit 'stuff' leaking into the noise source. Turns out it has about zero PSRR. (As I should have guessed since this particular mistake has bitten me before.) I threw a cap multiplier at it, and that worked fine... though perhaps overkill. So for clean noise, well filtered power is important.
The light sensitivity of the zener was useful, I could turn on an incandescent and kill the noise by 40dB... that made it easy to see what was underneath.
George H.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required