I have a LM386 that oscillates when the volume is turned up too far. It's operating with the default gain of 20 and there is a RC on the output as recommended in the app notes (10 ohms in series with .05uF). The oscillations will stop if I add a .05 cap across the input pot, but that reduces the signal and rolls off the high end. There is a
1000uF cap across the power terminals
Seems to be set up right, but makes too much noise when the volume is cranked up.
Have you got a capacitor between ground and the bypass pin 7?
Have you got a bypass capacitor between ground and the supply, pins 4 to 6?
Does the speaker ground end tie back to the ground pin, or to somewhere else on a ground bus?
You might try replacing the .05 uF output filter capacitor with a pair of .022 uF or .027 uF or .o33 uF caps in series across the supply pins of the chip, with the 10 ohm resistor connected to their common node.
I have a cheapy radio shack amplifed speaker that uses one. It has a huge amount of gain and never motor-boats or oscillates. It has enough gain that you can attach it directly to the output of a NE602 mixer and hear audio. That's allot of gain. :-)
I've never needed to nor do I wish to. It's rubbish and I have no use for it. My preference going back to days of old was TI's SN76023. You could make one of those perform surprisingly well !
I'm sure it would present no problems to an expert in audio amplifiers like myself though. After all, my 2kW amplifiers work beautifully and have class-leading performance figures and need I add, totally unconditional stability.
I really like the Panasonic V series stacked mylar film capacitors for low ESR hefty bypass use. The 1 uF at 50 volts is about a quarter inch cubed. But if space is very limited, a 10 uF 25 volt 1206 X5R SMT capacitor will do a nice job with something like a milliohm of ESR.
I have a few mica smt caps that work very nicely, they are expensive how ever because they are hard to make.. When I was working at Semco as an consultant, I was part of a project where we automated a robotics arm that had visual to the computer.
The arm used a mini vacuums finger to pick up the mica sheets to be stacked. This process would pick a cut piece from a pile, visually inspect it for defeats first, put it under a pressure plate where High voltage was applied for leakage test. If all of that passed, it was then pick up and place in a contact frame where the cap was being assembled. Very thin silver foil was laid between for the plate's from a mini spool entering from the side's of the frame..
When the stack was complete, a push finger comes down along with a button lift finger that pushes it out of the contact frame and is compressed between these 2 fingers as it is quickly hit with a HOT iron (very small) to bond the foils.. from there another HV test is done along with capacitance test which will very the compression tension of the fingers to make adjustments on the fly. the next process then passes this over to two other holding fingers where the encapsoluation is applied and harden with UV (Very Strong) UV. then another test is done, then they are place in little strip frames for later encaps and printing ..
All of that above it done using robotics arm with attached video camera's into a PC using DELPHI has the graphics and guidance for the movements. Things were color coded on the table to make it easy to track. this may sound like a lot of steps how ever, the process actually was very fast once you got it going. the operators only needed to dump small piles of pre-cut mica on a pick up area. From there, the robotics did the rest. Before that time, the Japanese was the only one's making then and their yield was like 5 out of 10 good, and that was done by hand as for as the stacking. We also suffered the same problem, but after the automation, it was like 99.99% good other than an unexpected machine failure/Jam up.
--
"I\'m never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
Well, I had high hopes for the bypass cap on pin 7, but unfortunately it didn't help. I tried various caps (0.4uF, 1uF,22uF) from pin 7 to ground with no improvement. Also tried small caps across the chip power pins with no change.
"One mans ringing may be another mans oscillation."
I solved my own ringing problem on the output of the LM386 using a ferrite bead. Why do I use this chip, I can walk into Radio Shack and find it for quick projects.
View this ferrite on page 6 of this PDF. Many good pointers on the page.
There is diode/fet detector circuit that drives a 10K pot that feeds the 386. The problem is not really oscillations but a loud roaring noise that seems to be related to the diode. I'm going to add a 100K in series with the 2 meg and a capacitor from the junction to ground. That should reduce feedback to the gate of the jfet. Something like this without the extra restistor or cap shown
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.