Driving transistor from HC273

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:40:59 +0000 in sci.electronics.basics, Pooh Bear wrote,

2222 is really easy to remember.
Reply to
David Harmon
Loading thread data ...

I'm considering using TWO 574s. Load all 216 574s and then all at once clock in the pixels for a row. This would allow the most on time. Is it worth the extra $60 in 574s? One benefit is that it would allow for a MUCH slower clock rate to the registers. I could take up to 10-14ms without any trouble.

Reply to
logjam

In which case it's NOT a 2N2222 !

Show me 2N2222s for 1 cent please.

Of course its true. Less Ib loading of a bias network for example.

That is a truly absurd comment.

What on earth do you think is going to happen here ?

Overdesign won't win you any friends when the kit gets costed.

Graham

Reply to
Pooh Bear

I can't say I find the thinking behind that very compelling. It would seem perhaps to be about the only thing going for the part though.

Graham

Reply to
Pooh Bear

I could afford the expensive part because I did save a ton on the LEDs. :) Got them all new old stock for .6 cents a piece.

Any ideas on the register situation?

Reply to
logjam

--
Sure it is; I\'m still me no matter what I\'m wearing.
Reply to
John Fields

--
Now you\'re just being pig-headed.

There\'s absolutely nothing wrong with 2N2222\'s or their differently
garbed counterparts when they\'re used properly.  As a matter of
fact, they\'ve got a lot going for them when you look at their cost.
Reply to
John Fields

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.