Right. That's when he heard it.
Right. That's when he heard it.
Don't remember that. I do remember the bad low-ESR aluminum electrolytics, allegdly due to a stolen formula for electrolyte that Taiwanese makers used, which apparently omitted some stabilizers. They were typically radial caps of something like 1,000uF-2,700uF/6.3V. Bulging at the top was one symptom.
It doesn't help that aluminum electrolytics typically have a mark at the minus side (case) whereas tantalums usually have the + side marked.
Why waste perfectly good bricks? At least they have a reason to exist!
And locked in separate padded cells, on two different continents. At least, till one of their motherships took one of them back off world.
On a sunny day (Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:00:11 -0700) it happened John Larkin wrote in :
Dont chicken out, I gave you the math.
Buy them lunch/beer when they find a design error.
Because you most likely deal with properly engineered electronics :)
Jamie
Buy them lunch/beer when they don't make a design error.
Yet you do it so often.
And you're AlwaysWrong.
John
So, you don't like 'Chicks'?
Here's a good paper that describes the problems with conventional tantalums in great detail, and talks about what Kemet has done about it:
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required