I have a small circuit with a 100uF cap that is usually charged with 6V. However it can be accidentally charged at -6V for few hours per day. I cannot add a diode in series as the cap must be able to discharge through a load. Would a diode or a Schottky in parallel be enough to protect it against reverse voltage? I mean, is -0.7V or -0.2V bad for an electrolytic (or tantalum) cap over a long time?
Or a non-polar electrolytic would simply be a better choice?
Octavio
"Octavio"
** Total bullshit. ** Shame about the voltage sound being shorted out.** Electros no - tants are more delicate.
** Its kinda obvious - isn't it ?
....... Phil
Bad idea all round.
Yes it would, obviously.
Dave.
-- Sounds to me like making sure the "accident" doesn\'t happen would be the best way to go. Got a schematic?
. Solid tantalum capacitors can take a small reverse voltage (up to a volt or so) without damage, so a Schottky diode in parallel to protect against reverse polarity would work. . Wet-slug tantalums and aluminum electrolytics will be damaged by application of even a small reverse voltage. Don't do it!
** Totally false.
Such caps can easily be rendered permanently leaky by a reverse voltages of
1 volt.** Bollocks.
...... Phil
circuit with a 100uF cap that is usually charged with 6V.
You can't say that without knowing the OP's application. A bi-polar cap is by far the best solution.
Dave.
The cap is part of a classic charge pump that adds its voltage to give +12V (or so) to a light load. However the driver may stay locked to a positive voltage for some time (and I can't do anything about this driver, out of reach). This means the cap will now be charged in reverse.
Octavio
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.