This scope will measure rising edge to rising edge jitter with a noise floor of about 22 ps RMS. That's pretty cool for a scope that's sampling at 2 GHz, every 500 ps.
If I'd used channels 1 and 3, both would sample at 4 GHz. Gotta try that.
This scope will measure rising edge to rising edge jitter with a noise floor of about 22 ps RMS. That's pretty cool for a scope that's sampling at 2 GHz, every 500 ps.
If I'd used channels 1 and 3, both would sample at 4 GHz. Gotta try that.
How do you know it's not an artifact?
-- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
Artifact? It's what the scope is reporting.
I have created known jitter to check the scope's algorithms. Seems right.
This scope will measure rising edge to rising edge jitter with a noise floor of about 22 ps RMS. That's pretty cool for a scope that's sampling at 2 GHz, every 500 ps.
If I'd used channels 1 and 3, both would sample at 4 GHz. Gotta try that.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required