Yeah, but I don't think I want *that* kind of attention. ;-)
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Piddling around with more LEDs
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
How about his car door? ;-)
-- http://improve-usenet.org/index.html aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white listed, or I will not see your messages. If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm There are two kinds of people on this earth: The crazy, and the insane. The first sign of insanity is denying that you\'re crazy.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
I found three unopened boxes of 50 in the supply closet.
-- http://improve-usenet.org/index.html aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white listed, or I will not see your messages. If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm There are two kinds of people on this earth: The crazy, and the insane. The first sign of insanity is denying that you\'re crazy.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
or
Earth's
ends do
small
insufficient
with
to
Yes, that is weird. Even i would expect one card to get the vertical rates the same. Would this happen to be a linux system (?), you may be able to get to the dot clock counts if it is.
From your own text:
You have set them to different vertical refresh rates is what you said. It had thought you said that setting them to different frequencies caused the problem, rather than setting them to the same frequency.
The resolutions are the same it appears, are the sizes different?
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
part:
snipped-for-privacy@manx.misty.com
so
athem or
on/near Earth's
ends do
small
insufficient
with
set to
No, it's my work system, so it's WinBlows. I might try a Linux CD, if I get a few minutes.
Yes, if they're set the *same* I see the interference bars walking through the display. I had them set differently so the beat was too fast to see. I had them set differently so I didn't see the bar.
I infer from this that the two display channels have different oscillators. Dumb design, but guess that's what I should expect from Dell.
Both 17", though I don't see how the monitor matters.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
part:
snipped-for-privacy@manx.misty.com
so
athem or
on/near Earth's
ends do
a small
insufficient
fluorescents with
set to
I wondered about the possibility of different sizes thus different spatial resolutions (different coverage areas on the retina crashing the stereo merging or something).
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
part:
snipped-for-privacy@manx.misty.com
snipped-for-privacy@manx.misty.com
and so
and a
them or
on/near Earth's
ends do
a small
insufficient
fluorescents with
set to
I don't see (NPI) how different sizes would cause the beat to move through one of the monitors.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
1024 lines on one 1020 on the other same hozintal rate.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
That's not the monitor's decision. I've already said that both are set to 1280x1024.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
At this point, i suspect your only hope is complaining to the video card vendor. In m$winders display card drivers there pretty much is no way to get to the clock count data.