Minimal SMPS regulator

Jan 08, 2006 3 Replies

Hi


In response to a query yesterday, I tried to sketch from memory my old minimal sm reg circuit. This is a minimal parts sm regulator.



Its asynchronous, as that saves lotsa parts. In plain english, the timings are all over the place.



This version is a minimum parts switched mode regulator. Its optimised for build cost rather than best performance.



I'm running from distant memory here... cross fingers:


. c e . IN _________________ _ ___________O_O_O____________________ OUT . | (_) | | | . | | | L1 | | . R1 > | b | ___ | . > | | ZD /^\\ | . | | | | | . | | ___ R2 > ___ + . | | /^\\ > --- . |_________|_____ | ____________ | | . | c |_ | | . | (_)-+ | . | e | b | . | | | . 0v __________________________________________________________ 0v


Tr P_diss is not so easy to calculate, as it depends on switching slew rate, frequency, load, how hard it switches on and off, etc. Guess, allow margin, then check its not too hot.



Output reservoir cap should be as small as is consistent with satisfactory operation. Increasing the cap will increase the tr's max current, and make any startup overshoot last longer. Smaller cap also means less inductance needed. Realise the max tr i is only controlled by L1, C, i_load and the in and out Vs, and will peak during startup for regs without soft start.



Worst case V overshoot (during startup with zero load current) is apx V_out + 2x (Vin - Vout). IRL it'll be much less due to resistances and load.



Maybe that was it, the 2 tr version that worked well. But I really cant remember. Just 2 Trs, 2 Rs, L & C.



Feedback welcome...


NT


PS I dont remember the L details at all, so heres a diy one for the @home hobbeasts: 4" of 1mm insulated gardening soft iron wire can be folded and apx 50 or 100 of turns of enamelled copper wrapped round it for an inductor.



Some may remember that I posted a worse regulator's schematic a while back but it wasn't that much worse.

Using a PNP for the switching device would save some losses. The way you have it, R1 has to be a very low value.

You need to add some better positive feedback at the control section so that the thing oscillates at some reasonable frequency.

In low volume, LM741, LM339s and etc cost the same as a single transistor.

-- kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

The same can be said for the very useful TL431 reference/regulator/ amplifier IC, e.g., $0.08 qty 250, for On Semi parts from Allied.

. s d L1 _____ . IN -----+------+----+-, ,------+---------------+--UUUUU--+----+----- OUT . | | _|_^_|_ | | | | . R4 | --- | | | | . | |/v | | _|_ | | . +----| |_______ | __________ /_\\ | | . | |\\ | | | | | | . | |______| _|_ | | | _|_ + . | | /_\\ R3 | R1 --- . |____________ | ______ | _____ | | | | . | | _|_ | | | | . | | /_\\---+-- | --------+ | . R5 | | | | | . | | | | R2 | . 0v __________________|________|______|________|_________|____|____ 0v

Thanks, - Win

For better preformance add a capacitor in series with R3 as shown:

Modified:

Without it, the load regulation is a bit funny. The voltage rises with increased load.

-- kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required