Low noise amplification

If it's genuinely a *preamp* there's no question. Amplify then filter.

Graham

a écrit dans le message de news: snipped-for-privacy@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Since you're planing using LN opamp, you don't have much noise riding on your signal (it wouldn't make sense otherwise).

Placing your BPF on front, will make you reduce the signal noise but amplify the BPF + amplifier noise, which you don't want.

The best is to amplify first, then filter. That way, you reduce all the system noise with your BPF. Also, only your first gain stage needs to be low noise.

Where did you get the impression that LPF are best placed before the amplifier? Other reasons might mandate this, but from a noise POV that's just wrong.

If the noise won't ever clip the amplifier, amplify first. If that's not the case (and it probably isn't) you could amplify *some* first (to improve s/n, but not enough to saturate), maybe 4:1 or something, and then filter, then amplify the rest of the way.

Note that, if your signal source impedance isn't optimal for the first opamp, you might be better off filtering first, using a bandpass filter with different impedances at opposite ends. This will give a free, noiseless voltage gain ahead of the first gain stage and also zap noise that could clip the amp.

John

Many active filters are pretty noisy, even when using low-noise opamps. Do a simulation on various active filters to get an appreciation of how noisy they can be. Thus, best to amplify first, then filter unless your noise is going to clip your amplifiers. If you need to use a BPF near the front-end (minimal gain before the filter), then consider a gyrator. They tend to be quieter and have a lower component sensitivity than state variable filters.

That would of course be a passive LC filter.

John

I'm glad someone made that point !

Graham

digital passive or analogue passive?

martin

Quick calcs suggest you have 26uV of noise at the moment. Better amps and putting the X128 amp first, only improves it to 18uV. You're looking for

"John Jardine."

Bandwidth = 15 kHz.

Noise = 6nVrtHz (OP467)

Gain = 128.

Works out to 94 uV.

....... Phil

Yes indeed. A good change. I'd started out with the lower noise amp. :( john

ho hum, who cares?

John

In article , snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote: [....]

Neither and both.

The gain stages should provide some of your filtering and then be followed by the rest of the filter.

As others have suggested, you may need to put enough filtering early in the circuit to prevent clipping,

A multistage filter always has some stages with higher "Q"s and some with lower "Q"s. You want some low "Q" stages to be the last ones in the filter. The higher "Q" stages tend to create noise at their cut off frequency. The lower "Q" stages will tend to roll off that noise.

Be aware that the low noise amplification is only achieved with a sufficiently low source impedance. See page 11 of the LT6230 datasheet : 100 Ohms or less. Another matter is the layout, the digital part should be isolated from the analog part. Especially tricky are the SPI chains. The SPI to the ADC should be quiet during the ADC operation. And the relevant low amplitude signals should be handled differential.

Rene