I really wonder if patent US20130121397 A1 would hold up. It seems to fail the "obviousness" test....
"- A radio receiver method, said method comprising: receiving a broadcast signal comprising phase modulation (PM) over a legacy amplitude modulated (AM) signal, said broadcast signal encoded with time information; and extracting said time information from the phase of said received signal. "
Clearly, this is describing the concept of receiving the signal that is being broadcast without indicating anything unique about how to do that. Claims starting with 9 reiterate the same claims but in regard to an actual receiver, again, without saying anything specific about said receiver. Claim 18 is very similar to claim 1.
So what in patent US20130121397 A1 is actually "novel"?