Is there anything better than this cheesy X10 stuff, something that is _not_ RF based like zigbee would be, and still affordable? The X10 protocol is not good and the modules are IMHO utter junk.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Have you looked at the Intellion powerline modem ICs?
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
Sporadic E is the Earth\'s aluminum foil beanie for the \'global warming\'
sheep.
I've only seen patents from them. But if I have to roll my own wusing some specialty chip I'd rather do it from scratch, MSP430 or PSoC. I don't have a lot of trust in powerline comms companies anymore.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Is it the price of wireless or just being wireless that you don't like?
If it's just the price, then look at Z-Wave. It's older technology than ZigBee but it's works darn well. I've ripped out all my X10 stuff and replaced it with Z-Wave.
The thing that I really like about it is that every device acts as a repeater, so controller-to-device distance usually isn't an issue.
Here's the stuff I have:
formatting link
Bob
--
== All google group posts are automatically deleted due to spam ==
I had the same experience. Left me in an extreme state of disgust that company making those "products" would have audacity to sell them knowing how bad the quality is.
Sorry, but RF is the rage and wired standards are out. Z-wave is the latest in wireless standards, consortia, conspiracies, IP litigation, and products. See:
List of players:
Some detail:
Chip vendor:
Light reading:
Runs on 908.42MHz in the US and 868.42MHz in EU at 9600 baud. 30 meters indoors and 100 meters outdoors. It can be bi-directional so you have some indication that the device actually responded. X10 is unidirectional. 232(?) nodes maximum per network. It is setup as a mesh networks to extend range (i.e. no central access point) with self routing and self healing routes.
I've played with some of the Leviton Vizia products and find them "good enough". That means that they do what's advertised, but I sure would like to see some more features, diagnostics, monitoring, and clues as to what's happening.
The problem is the high price, but I expect that to drop:
Affordable will have to wait.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
RF in this house is going to be a nightmare. The builders wanted to be extra good and insulated all inner walls with aluminum backed fiber. Anything past a few hundred MHz doesn't get any range here.
Which means you have to have repeaters and they must be on circuits that are always powered.
Personally I don't trust the company behind it anymore. They sold timers which always failed in the same way and then refused to sell the simple plastic gear to fix them. They didn't even answer multiple inquiries. That gets rewarded with a loooong ban in this house ;-)
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
In this super RF-tight house that would translate into maybe 15m indoors and outdoors only if there is a window more or less directly in the path. Abover 433MHz it gets really bad.
Plus I don't want any Intermatic products.
The other thing that puzzles me: The EPA and all kinds of agencies push CFL yet most of these home automation guys don't seem to get it. They still sell dimmer modules that cannot be turned into a non-dim CFL compatible mode.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
I have customers with similar houses. I have to use repeaters and bridges between sections of the house. Sometimes, I can get away with shooting through doorways. For Z-wave, the trick is just to put two switch or wall power devices back to back on the same wall. That will act as a repeater. There are also bridges between X10 and other technologies that might help.
More reading:
You are really difficult to please. Are there any other companies on your black list that I should avoid?
Z-wave technology is about 2-3 years old. The CFL recommendations are somewhat more recent. My guess(tm) is a dimmable CFL would need to have the Z-wave chip integrated. However, you're correct about the dimmer modules. They could easily have added an on/off feature in place of dimming. However, I think there are some on/off only modules available, but I'm too lazy to look.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Could be tough here. The boxes are metal and then there is another layer of aluminum-backed fiber behind them that you could only rip out by busting through the drywall. That methods has a very low WAF ;-)
I've had that: Transmitter in the office, other side in the kitchen next to it. No signal :-(
Yep, like one chip mfg that starts with "M" ...
Very few. The powers to be in that market simply don't seem to realize where the trend goes. And the liability that comes with it should uncle Leroy climb on that old ladder and screw a CFL into the socket where he technically shouldn't.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Which one? Motorola, Maxim, Microchip, Monolythic Memories, Mostek, MOS Technologies, Marvell, Marconi-Elliot, Matsushita, Mitsubishi... Yeah, I know some of these are defunct.
--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# http://802.11junk.com jeffl@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.