iCouplers versus opto couplers

Jun 02, 2005 1 Replies

Hi all,



is there a reason NOT to use the new iCouplers in place of standard opto couplers like for example HCPL060x devices from Agilent?



This would eliminate the rising edge problem from the open collector output of the HCPL060x resulting in unwanted signal distortion ...



A short note in experience using the iCoupler would be very appreciated.



Markus



Hello Markus,

Ok, I have never used iCouplers in designs. But I have designed extensively with transformer based isolation barriers and it seems that is the core of iCouplers (but their transformers are monolithic, I believe).

My experiences:

I get a lot of bandwidth out of transformers. And a whole lot more speed per Dollar compared to opto couplers. No rising/falling edge problems. But best of all, transformers are generic. That means that it is unlikely that your purchasing chief comes running down the hallway with a red face because some part suddenly has become unavailable.

Analog Devices is usually very dependable but I still would have an uneasy feeling about any single sourced part. I'd rather take a #43 toroid with a couple of windings. Ferrite hasn't ever gone on allocation in my 20 years of design work. Neither has wire.

Regards, Joerg

formatting link

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required