HPM weapons

Hook, line, and sinker...

Anon bozo wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@news.sf.sbcglobal.net:

must be what you have for brains.

Like everything else you "KNOW"?

There are more than two ways to get an aircraft flight certified. Checkout how to get things like a "longeasy" get flight certified.

Well duh, the inspector does not get to choose the standards to apply. That gets defined on the certification request itself. Like the differences between a personal drivers license, and a commercial drivers license.

A society has a "right" to exist only to the extent that it protects the rights of the ordinary individuals within it. When that is replaced by coercion it should be toppled. See the "patriot act".

There are some absolutes, they are called physical laws. For normal terrestrial surface speeds, Newton's laws are completely correct. Mathematics is all about absolutes, and Math is the language of physics.

For some chance at some real enlightenment carefully read "The Abolition of Man" by C. S. Lewis.

If you have really solid math skills and really solid reasoning skills you can start from mere observation and arrive at "the Dao" at the end of the previously mentioned book. I did just that myself, surely others can.

Whether you believe "it should be toppled" or not is irrelevant to said society. If you can topple it, great, but chances are it is you who will be toppled. That's just the way it is.

Now you're being stupid. BTW, newton's laws are not correct. They don't include relativity.

There are no absolute rights. The second amendment is not absolute. Neither is the first, nor any other.

Is that quote, out of context (as they all are when used in such a simplistic manner), supposed to make you look "enlightened"?

Oh, you're now back to "moron".

Just more vitriol, not responding to the actual content. BTW what quote? The quotation marks are being used to delimit the title of a book.

I responded to the content. It seems that you didn't feel it was necessary.

book.

Why don't you use _underlines_ like everyone else?

Apparently I wasn't clear - I should have said, "certify it to FAA standards", I guess. I mean, if it was military-grade, it should certainly be flyable! (unless it's been cut up and lashed together, which I had never heard of until that other poster mentioned it).

Thanks, Rich

It should be certifiable as "experimental" i.e. home made.

He has it certified of course, _for private use only_. He could not fly it otherwise.

It cannot be used for _commercial_ purposes as it is different from the _commercial_ version, and the _type_ certificate of airworthiness obtained by the manufacturer for the _commercial_ version does not apply. "Type" refers to the make, model and version of the aircraft.

Regards Ian