What is currently the best choice of filter capacitor for the PSU section of a high-end signal generator the output of which (obviously) really needs to be as ripple-free as humanly possible? Just in *GENERAL* terms, please guys; don't want to get bogged down in specifics and calculations at this stage, please!
Roughly what frequency is the ripple at? Mains, 50kHz, 2MHz?
Polymer electrolytics are pretty good, as are ceramic caps. More stages are better than fewer, and you can always use the cap multiplier gambit. Regulators with few-uV RMS noise are available.
--sp
--
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Amazon link for AoE 3rd Edition: http://tinyurl.com/ntrpwu8
Microchip link for 2015 Masters in Phoenix: http://tinyurl.com/l7g2k48
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom Gave us:
I am not a troll, and I have orders of magnitude more electronic knowledge than you do.
What's the matter, dumbfuck? Does the truth hurt?
Filtering ripple takes more than a simple "filter cap" or "filter cap choice", you retarded putz.
You sport about the same 'intelligence' about electronics as Donald Trump does on US history, or foreign policy or political posture. He is an absolute idiot, and you are right there in the same class.
You and "a high end signal generator" are two things that are mutually exclusive. So your grasp of what internals are needed in one are pretty far apart as well.
Particularly if you are so dumb (in electronics)that you need to come in here and ask such a question, which reveals just how ill equipped you are for completing any such design task.
And as far as my "track record" goes, it only puts the pinch on abject idiots such as yourself.
Go somewhere else and spread your stench.
In here you are transparent, and you asking such a low end, poorly worded revealing question makes you quite transparent, and obviously not equipped to tackle such a complex design as a "high end signal generator".
So yeah, punk... you are on par with the SkyTard, who has been invading several newsgroups with his utter stupidity.
And that is despite the fact that your question is on topic here. It simply exposes such how simple your skill level is. Quit while you are ahead., or your 'ultra low' profile of stupidity will get raised. ooops... too late.
Ripple is determined by two factors. One is the capacitance relative to the amount of ripple current flowing and the frequency. The other is the ESR of the cap relative to the peak current.
Ceramic caps have the lowest ESR of caps commonly used for PSU outputs. Electrolytic caps provide more capacitance at a lower price. Sometimes the best tradeoff is a combination, other times ceramic caps alone will do the job well enough. The only ways to know are to do the calculations or to build it both ways and measure the ripple. :)
Doesn't Pan offer filtering? In Agent I just killfile DecadentLoser so that I'm not exposed to his (or other loser's :-) rants.... keeps me calm and my blood pressure low >:-}
The only time I see his rants is when you feed the troll :-( ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
Decadent Linux may be extraordinarily rude, but he is right that there is no answer to this question - we would need a lot more details to give useful answers. Of particular importance are the frequency of noise to be rejected, the type of currents and voltages involved, any unusual circumstances or restrictions (such as wanting to be as small as possible), and some information about the rest of the PSU design.
And a capacitor alone does not make a filter - you need it in combination with something else (an inductance or resistance), and usually in multiple stages with multiple filter components.
With that information, someone should be able to give you more helpful answers. (Not me, probably - it's not really my field.)
He reminds me of a quite (electronically) brilliant Finnish guy who got poisoned from his mercury amalgam fillings, became 'as mad as a hatter', tried to sue the (Finnish) government and the medical establishment, did probably some other things wrong too, and finally had to leave the country due to harassment/persecution and went to the USA with his electronics knowledge, where he continued ranting around where and whenever he got the opportunity and at the slightest provocation.
It seems that mercury poisoning does that to your brain/constitution.
Generally one buys enough filter cap to get the ripple down to maybe 1 volt p-p, then adds a regulator to stabilize the voltage and greatly reduce ripple. A second regulator or c-multiplier can be used to further reduce noise and ripple, to power the more sensitive signal generator stages.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
All things considered, same as always, electrolytic. Low cost, high value, moderate to low ESR, reasonable life (when not run hot).
For any other considerations, it's up to you. Cost? Operating frequency? Size? General *considerations*, yes, but no generalized *conclusion*. That's what us designers get paid for. ;-)
Even more generally, however: you seem to dismiss system-level considerations as obvious! But no, a signal generator is a system. The power supply only needs to be as well-filtered as the PSRR of the output stage, preamps and such require for the desired output noise level. And if there's a regulator stage in there as well, even less (primary) filtering is needed.
And you can locally filter and regulate stages that are unusually sensitive, or rebuild them in terms of ratios and ground-referenced voltages, to increase their PSRR.
There should be absolutely no excuse for excruciatingly clean DC, not since tubes have gone the way of the dodo. Complementary semiconductors (and good constant current characteristics) free us from the burden of B+ referenced signals and low PSRR. :-)
Tim
--
Seven Transistor Labs
Electrical Engineering Consultation
Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com
"Cursitor Doom" wrote in message
news:mq7o16$suq$1@dont-email.me...
> Gentlemen,
>
> What is currently the best choice of filter capacitor for the PSU section
> of a high-end signal generator the output of which (obviously) really
> needs to be as ripple-free as humanly possible?
> Just in *GENERAL* terms, please guys; don't want to get bogged down in
> specifics and calculations at this stage, please!
>
> tia,
> cd
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.