Well, that could be another problem... If the drones run on fuel instead of electric, any crash could ignite a brush fire. (Maybe so even with batteries. L-ion fires are notariously difficult to put out.)
Well, that could be another problem... If the drones run on fuel instead of electric, any crash could ignite a brush fire. (Maybe so even with batteries. L-ion fires are notariously difficult to put out.)
That's pretty funny. If a local sheriff arrests a federal agent for enforcing an "unconstitutional" federal law he would find himself up on federal charges I'm sure. So I'm sure that is just a lot of hot air on his part.
Isn't that what the Pony Express used to do?
That's just plain silly. Why can't they fly with the same rules as other aircraft? They aren't flying around willy-nilly are they?
I guess there is one effect that makes them more dangerous. In a conventional airplane the pilot is the first person to the scene of an accident. That is a *big* incentive to avoid accidents. :)
"Other aircraft" do NOT get to cross airfield runways either. Their ENTIRE flight plan MUST be logged and registered.
Yes, they are.
All the more reason to control it. Think about how huge a mistake it is to allow a parent to introduce his child to guns without a proper training course being involved. Most dads (read ALL men) have a pretty bent mindset. Just ask George Zimmerman.
In the military gun AND mind training is controlled, and notice how one does not see huge numbers of military murders happening. Just the one in a hundred thousand loon. A far better number than your basic society figure.
pper comes in, drop off cargo, and rest (recharge). Second leg picks it up and go. We need to build cargo loading and unloading anyway. Adding batt ery swapping would be more expensive.
Yes, we are doing the unmanned Pony Express, for similar reason.
I think Amazon just filed pattern for Unmanned Phony Express. Sorry, Pony. We started the idea as early as 2015. Well, you guys can be my witness in court. Lee vs. Amazon.
It's for charging Electric Ground Vehicle (EGV).
Patent - 2016:
Your turn...
John
#9,778,653 (Oct 2017) is the first one involving EV charging. We would certainly run into patent issues with Amazon, but we had no knowledge of their work back in 2014 and 2015.
I have no direct knowledge, I just spent a minute searching...good luck!
John :-#)#
Can't believe they can patent something so simple minded and obvious. For instant, energy exchange between vehicles has been around since drivers hel p each other with portable gas tanks. They listed serial, USB as comm link s between vehicles. Seriously, USB? Some says that they are patenting jun ks to prevent others to do anything remotely closed to it. That's a proble m with our current patent system as well.
No one can patent an idea by itself!
-- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
edward.ming.lee is a troll and a village idiot on the order of bitterex. ...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson | mens | | Analog Innovations | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at
To those of us in my age bracket...
GREEN means inexperienced and/or incompetent.
Jim Thomson is someone I don't bother to response to.
you just did
cerns to the FAA. What do you think?
What about autonomous drones? I'm talking about birds. As a pilot, don't you already have a problem with that?
The US Military seems to do pretty well flying drones that aren't within li ne of sight of the pilot. In fact, they aren't even in the same hemisphere . The only problem they seem to have is delivering their packages to the w rong house. I think Amazon won't get nearly as much push back from that as the Military does.
Do you spend much time flying below 400 feet??? If you do you are violatin g FAA rules.
Rick C.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required