Eureka: Light is Demystified

Hear here.

Reply to
Androcles
Loading thread data ...

idiot "Uncle rect-Al" aka anAl Alan Schwartz, the idiot, wrote: ["ab initio" corrected & snipped the idiot's rect-Al shit, for clarity]

One starts by assuming & diddle ab initio wrong. Being wrong, jury-rig corrected for calculation is OK. Uncle rect-Al exposed the weakness in late 1999: It is trivially observed [like here in rect-Al's own post]:

formatting link

NOBODY knows Hells bells, quantized for ab initio to pull its thumbs out of its collective ass. Somebody should look. [like here on rect-Al's own website]:

formatting link

Given any two irrational relationships as good or better by picking The Senate of Rome above the stink. In AD 476 the stink rose to at Optical Radiation Corporation. So desperate was management that it allowed both tradesmen with no formal education - [rect-Al refers here to Hebe Herbie, the hate filled, biogoted and racist kike G=EMC^2] to whack sophisticated suit- and tie-wearing engineers [snip rest of rect-Al' scrap] Hell, Management didn't even say "thank you."

hanson wrote: ... ahahahaha... Schwartz is still sour and full of hate and anger because he never made it into management. So, the rect-Al idiot tries to manage in sci.physics, which he himself managed to label as a "river of shit" ... ahahahaha... Great rect-Al job, Schwartz, you Dreidel. Thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

>
Reply to
hanson

The Chinese were looking a while ago. Then they said they pulled the plug. Their sudden reluctance to finish the experiment (or perhaps to share the rest of the data they intended to collect) had an odor about it.

Then it seemed that you came up with a Plan B to test your hypothesis with benzil crystals. It sounded like a quicker, cheaper, more accessible way to test the same hypothesis.

If it really is quicker, cheaper and more accessible, why hasn't someone done it?

Why haven't /you/ done it?

I have been reading your "Somebody should look" challenge for years.

Why is "Somebody should look" to be read as "Somebody /else/ should look"?

Stop buying ammo for a few weeks, use some of the bazillion dollars you made on your roach poison, and leverage it into Nobel prize money.

Or is the experiment much more expensive or complicated than it seems from your assertion here? Message-ID:

What happened to the gifted team who ran the simulations before the Chinese ran the Eotvos experiment? Can you not all chip in and make this benzil experiment happen? Or have they stopped believing that an experiment will confirm your hypothesis?

From the same post referenced above:

If it takes nothing more than a weekend in an undergrad p-chem lab to look, what should it tell onlookers that no one, including Uncle Al, is making the effort to look?

-- Adam

Reply to
Adam

--------- AHAHAHAHAHA... Priceless!... AHAHAHA... ----------

"Adam" wrote:

Uncle rect-Al wrote: [snip crap] Somebody should look.

"Adam" wrote: The Chinese were looking a while ago. Then they said they pulled the plug. Their sudden reluctance to finish the experiment (or perhaps to share the rest of the data they intended to collect) had an odor about it.

hanson wrote: .... ahahahaha... IIRC, rect-Al performed one of his Yiddisher street corner performances for them & probably referred to them as "idiots" while he was claiming prior art... ahahahaha... So, they pulled the plug and let rect-Al die on the vine... ahahahaha... and NOBODY looked.

"Adam" wrote: Then it seemed that you [rect-Al] came up with a Plan B to test your hypothesis > with benzil crystals. It sounded like a quicker, cheaper, more accessible way to test the same hypothesis. If it really is quicker, cheaper and more accessible, why hasn't someone done it? Why haven't /you/ done it?

hanson wrote: But rect-Al so did... And to his credit he spent $500 for a set of calorimetric analysis of the chiral Benzil xx. However when the results came back and told him what he didn't want to hear, he assumed that the testers in the lab were... well... "idiots"...

"Adam" wrote: I have been reading your "Somebody should look" challenge for years. Why is "Somebody should look" to be read as "Somebody /else/ should look"?

hanson wrote: .. the reason why "nobody else looks" is because rect-All lives in a sea of "idiots".. ahahaha... rect-Al himself pointed out and said: :: UA:: ||||| ....Goyim could study for their entire lifetime and :: UA:: ||||| not come close to what is hardwired at birth for :: UA:: ||||| Yahweh's Chosen.

So, what do you expect?... "oye weh!.. "Trust Me!"... "Go figure!"

"Adam" wrote: Stop buying ammo for a few weeks, use some of the bazillion dollars you made on your roach poison, and leverage it into Nobel prize money.

hanson wrote: ... but rect-Al has no $$ from his unsellable cockroach repellent because the EPA "idiots" didn't approve it, & rect-Al's customers were "idiots" too since they didn't buy it... and Einstein didn't sweat neither, like rect-Al said that Albert should, because of rect-Al's Eotvoes experiment, and so rect-Al's only money available comes with his disability check, from when rect-Al burnt his ass in a organo- metallic fire at his lab bench... or so his story went... ahahaha...

And so rect-Al runs to the gun store as frequently as he can because in his rect-Al mind it's the "idiots" from the "diversity" that will be the "somebody should look" that will come looking for rect-Al...

Thanks for the laughs guys,... ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

Reply to
hanson

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.