^^ Unrelated, in case anyone was wondering.
Does seem like there's a lot of Tims (or Jims or, more generally, ?ims) and Williamses in electronics. But that could just be coincidence in my perception.
Tim
^^ Unrelated, in case anyone was wondering.
Does seem like there's a lot of Tims (or Jims or, more generally, ?ims) and Williamses in electronics. But that could just be coincidence in my perception.
Tim
let w=1i*f/fc and filt=1./(1+w+w.*w+w.^3+w.^4+w.^5) [a fairly decent LPF] then, if the spectrum of a signal is sf outf=filt.*sf provides you with the spectrum of the output from the filter looks right etc can be converted backinto time waveform
new, let w=f/fc, with NO phase shifts and filt2=1./(1+w+w.*w+w.^3+w.^4+w.^5) [again, a fairly decent LPF]
and again, if the spectrum of a signal is sf out2f=filt2.*sf the signal 'looks' very similar, but there were no phase shifts like in a normal filter.
It's difficult to get the LPF cutoff, but a single pole with NO phase shift is fairly easy to get.
But,I have no idea how to relate this physical phenomenon with concepts of violating causality.
Does a PIN diode exhibit any of the frequency attenuation with no phase shifts?
Nice name.
The filter book is Electronic Filter Design Handbook by Williams and Taylor.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required