On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:06:24 -0800, Dog Bagfood Gave us:
Now the idiot thinks that a planetoid's gravitational force is a point source. Sure, it has a single point of focus, but the entire mass is REQUIRED to create that force field.
Somebody oughtta whopp you upside da haed with a Van Allen belt!
Worm(s) or not, you have demonstrated a lack of knowledge of what the scien tific definition of work is, which is involved in one of the FIRST courses you would ever take in science of physics.
What have you to say about that ? Will you stand against the ACTUAL definit ion still ? Or will you change your position in the face of a WORLDFUL of p roof ?
Your call.
To amned here : Like the switch that simply transfers the power to a load, the hand is just that, IN THAT EQUATION. The "work" done by the human body to burn up that sugar or whatever in NOT IN THAT CIRCUIT, OR EQUATION. It i s irrelevant. In the scientific sense, no work is done.
If you cannot understand separating these principles, I do not know what th e f*ck to tell you.
I have come to the conclusion that Nov 12 (32 minutes ago)DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno is a world reknown economist and is responsible for the state of the world economy, and if not, someone just like that is.
Betcha he has one of them thar eternal combustion or whatever machines. No fuel just runs ferever.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:18:45 -0800 (PST), snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com Gave us:
Speak up, worm.
I did no such thing.
You must have never hiked. To gain kinetic energy against a spheroid's gravity, one performs work. Gaining altitude away from the center of said spheroid requires work be performed.
Look. Place a ball on the stand. Is work being done? NO.
Was work done to get it there from however many feet closer to the center of the Earth it was before it was placed onto the stand? Yes.
When it falls off the stand, work will be performed as it strikes the ground as well.
THAT is a HARD, mechanical stand.
The micro-adjustments a human makes to hold such an item stationary, however, is an entirely different animal. It is NOT "at rest". You and your claim that I am wrong are toast.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:18:45 -0800 (PST), snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com Gave us:
I'd say that you are a goddamned idiot, because you place a space between your statement and your punctuation, to resolve some stupid, imagined unreadability.
If you can't even get that right, how am I supposed to place any credence in any of your pathetic "you don't know jack" cracks?
And you missed a couple of particulars if you ever took such a course.
You aren't aware of having demonstrated a gap in your education, but your d enial merely makes the gap a little more obvious.
It's not micro-adjustments. It takes energy to keep a muscle contracted and static, but that energy isn't being expended in any useful way, so it does n't get totted up as useful work. Not should it. If you had any sense, you' d use a stand to support the ball where ever it needed to be supported.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 02:33:55 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman Gave us:
It is NOT "static" idiot.
If there is no stiff strut under the ball... if a person's flesh and balance upon one's feet is the "stand", it is, and I repeat IS an active mechanism, and NOT a hard stanchion.
So, YOU idiots need to look up the word STANCHION, because you are all assuming one where one is not in place.
At a fixed frequency, like any linear device (inductor, capacitor, resistor or combination) the field is proportional to voltage. But, the relationship is to RMS average voltage
flux = field * area = constant *(1/ frequency) * voltage_RMS * sin(2*pi*frequency * t + phase)
for a pure inductor, the current relationship is
flux = field * area = constant2 * current
with no need to invoke averages; that's the instantaneous current proportional to the instantaneous flux.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.