China Sinopharm Already Vaccinating 100s Thousands Of People

That would be their inactivated virus vaccine. All the preliminary results are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in people who receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight. Now the million dollar question: how effective is it? Not a whole lot of information about that. But it did do very well with the animal models, better than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promising.

formatting link

In other news, Russia is bound and determined to vaccinate 200 million people with its expedited vaccine U.S. sources initially brushed it off as an inactivated virus too. But it's not. It's a double adenovirus vaccine and fully described in article recently published in The Lancet.

formatting link

Reply to
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred
Loading thread data ...

s are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in people who receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight.

information about that. But it did do very well with the animal models, bet ter than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promising.

Around 40% to 50% had complications, such as head aches, muscle aches, feve rs, and others. Not sure if it's permanent, or any better than just catchi ng the virus. The only different is that the "vaccine" is less likely to a ttack the respiration system. They started "vaccinating" pigs (sorry, peop le) in Feb 2020, two months after saying it cannot pass between human, one months after saying it will. That's speedy for "vaccine" development. Peo ple said they probably have virus samples for at least six months, in the P

4 lab.
Reply to
Edward Lee

lts are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in people wh o receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight.

f information about that. But it did do very well with the animal models, b etter than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promising.

vers, and others. Not sure if it's permanent, or any better than just catch ing the virus. The only different is that the "vaccine" is less likely to a ttack the respiration system. They started "vaccinating" pigs (sorry, peopl e) in Feb 2020, two months after saying it cannot pass between human, one m onths after saying it will. That's speedy for "vaccine" development. People said they probably have virus samples for at least six months, in the P4 l ab.

More speculations on the origin of the CCP Vaccine 2020. The "vaccine" is a weaken version of the free version released to the World. We are just s uffering complications. So, don't worry, die happy:

formatting link
oronavirus/

Reply to
Edward Lee

sults are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in people who receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight.

of information about that. But it did do very well with the animal models, better than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promising.

fevers, and others. Not sure if it's permanent, or any better than just cat ching the virus. The only different is that the "vaccine" is less likely to attack the respiration system. They started "vaccinating" pigs (sorry, peo ple) in Feb 2020, two months after saying it cannot pass between human, one months after saying it will. That's speedy for "vaccine" development. Peop le said they probably have virus samples for at least six months, in the P4 lab.

a weaken version of the free version released to the World. We are just su ffering complications. So, don't worry, die happy:

-coronavirus/

There's always a market for stupid conspiracy theories, and there is always a "scientist" who is short of money willing to make some by selling into t hat market.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

results are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in peopl e who receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight.

ot of information about that. But it did do very well with the animal model s, better than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promising.

, fevers, and others. Not sure if it's permanent, or any better than just c atching the virus. The only different is that the "vaccine" is less likely to attack the respiration system. They started "vaccinating" pigs (sorry, p eople) in Feb 2020, two months after saying it cannot pass between human, o ne months after saying it will. That's speedy for "vaccine" development. Pe ople said they probably have virus samples for at least six months, in the P4 lab.

is a weaken version of the free version released to the World. We are just suffering complications. So, don't worry, die happy:

te-coronavirus/

ys a "scientist" who is short of money willing to make some by selling into that market.

There's always people who would collaborate with the dark forces and deny e verything. CV 2020 is bad, but not bad enough to wipe out the human race. But the worry some question is: what else do they have cooking in the lab .

Reply to
Edward Lee

y results are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in peo ple who receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight.

lot of information about that. But it did do very well with the animal mod els, better than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promisin g.

es, fevers, and others. Not sure if it's permanent, or any better than just catching the virus. The only different is that the "vaccine" is less likel y to attack the respiration system. They started "vaccinating" pigs (sorry, people) in Feb 2020, two months after saying it cannot pass between human, one months after saying it will. That's speedy for "vaccine" development. People said they probably have virus samples for at least six months, in th e P4 lab.

" is a weaken version of the free version released to the World. We are jus t suffering complications. So, don't worry, die happy:

tute-coronavirus/

ways a "scientist" who is short of money willing to make some by selling in to that market.

everything.

Says our resident conspiracy theory peddler, who is willing to believe anyt hing that makes the CCP look bad, rather than concentrating on the nasty st uff that they are actually doing.

rry some question is: what else do they have cooking in the lab.

Obviously something that would wipe almost all of them before it got around to doing in the rest of us.

For some odd reason conspiracy theory buffs seem to think that people who a re doing the remarkably dangerous stuff that they choose to imagine is bei ng done, or has been done, don't care about killing off themselves and thei r families in the process.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

lts are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in people wh o receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight.

f information about that. But it did do very well with the animal models, b etter than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promising.

vers, and others. Not sure if it's permanent, or any better than just catch ing the virus. The only different is that the "vaccine" is less likely to a ttack the respiration system. They started "vaccinating" pigs (sorry, peopl e) in Feb 2020, two months after saying it cannot pass between human, one m onths after saying it will. That's speedy for "vaccine" development. People said they probably have virus samples for at least six months, in the P4 l ab.

Those are not complications, that trivial little stuff like pain and rednes s at the site, fevers, and whatnots are always present and transient. Compl ications are things like neurological disorders, autoimmune disease, and ca ncer.

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

sults are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in people who receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight.

of information about that. But it did do very well with the animal models, better than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promising.

fevers, and others. Not sure if it's permanent, or any better than just cat ching the virus. The only different is that the "vaccine" is less likely to attack the respiration system. They started "vaccinating" pigs (sorry, peo ple) in Feb 2020, two months after saying it cannot pass between human, one months after saying it will. That's speedy for "vaccine" development. Peop le said they probably have virus samples for at least six months, in the P4 lab.

a weaken version of the free version released to the World. We are just su ffering complications. So, don't worry, die happy:

-coronavirus/

Wuhan wasn't doing growth-of-function studies, they were collecting samples for the American labs. They were testing new virus samples for ability to infect human cells, but that's the first I heard they were gene editing the m in the process. They weren't really getting enough money from U.S. to do anything very complicated and extensive.

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

results are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in peopl e who receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight.

ot of information about that. But it did do very well with the animal model s, better than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promising.

, fevers, and others. Not sure if it's permanent, or any better than just c atching the virus. The only different is that the "vaccine" is less likely to attack the respiration system. They started "vaccinating" pigs (sorry, p eople) in Feb 2020, two months after saying it cannot pass between human, o ne months after saying it will. That's speedy for "vaccine" development. Pe ople said they probably have virus samples for at least six months, in the P4 lab.

is a weaken version of the free version released to the World. We are just suffering complications. So, don't worry, die happy:

te-coronavirus/

es for the American labs. They were testing new virus samples for ability t o infect human cells, but that's the first I heard they were gene editing t hem in the process. They weren't really getting enough money from U.S. to d o anything very complicated and extensive.

Officially, they were collecting samples only. But they did more for the P LA under the table. The lab was officially taken over by the People Libera tion Army's Bio Warfare division in Jan 2020. The commanding officer vacci nated herself on her birthday in Feb 2020. These are all open public recor ds. The unknown part is how long had they been involved before. Would the commander risks her own life if they did not have plenty of tests before.

Reply to
Edward Lee

y results are excellent: 100% development of neutralizing antibodies in peo ple who receive it, and nary an adverse reaction in sight.

lot of information about that. But it did do very well with the animal mod els, better than some of the leading western candidates, so that's promisin g.

es, fevers, and others. Not sure if it's permanent, or any better than just catching the virus. The only different is that the "vaccine" is less likel y to attack the respiration system. They started "vaccinating" pigs (sorry, people) in Feb 2020, two months after saying it cannot pass between human, one months after saying it will. That's speedy for "vaccine" development. People said they probably have virus samples for at least six months, in th e P4 lab.

" is a weaken version of the free version released to the World. We are jus t suffering complications. So, don't worry, die happy:

tute-coronavirus/

ples for the American labs. They were testing new virus samples for ability to infect human cells, but that's the first I heard they were gene editing them in the process. They weren't really getting enough money from U.S. to do anything very complicated and extensive.

PLA under the table.

Edward Lee's fertile imagination tells him what they did for the PLA under the table. Saner people look for more reliable information.

This was when the top level of the CCP had decided that there really was an epidemic happening in Wuhan, and they needed to do something about it.

A virus research lab is just the sort of place you'd re-purpose to work on a defense against the virus.

In the west we've now got some 150 groups working on vaccines against Covid

-19. Most of them were working on something before January 2020.

The commander would presumably have known what she was doing, but military people are trifle cavalier with human lives, even their own.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.