That doesn't alter the fact that you're constantly moving the goal posts. You *are* defending the FPGA as the general solution when it is quite decidedly only applicable in the niches. You wanted to know what DSP had a CODEC. I told you but now you whine that it won't solve YOUR problem. It's not my job to do your work.
If you refuse to understand, why do you bother coming here?
Only because you are repeating your silly FPGA uber alles, nonsense.
WFT are you talking about? You *are* saying that FPGAs are the cat's ass for all applications when nothing could be further from the truth. they're a niche and the solution of last resort. Well, and ASSC is the solution of last resort, but...
Absolutely wrong. FPGAs are *only* useful when there is no other choice. For anything else, they will always be the most expensive solution. Your position is exactly a nail looking at every tool as a hammer.
You clearly don't simulate. You've completely ignored the issue here. Like the elephant in the phone booth, FPGA zealots want to ignore it. Simulation is much more work than design, yet it is always forgotten in these discussions.
Oh, good grief! You never have to rework libraries? Roll your own, for what was free in the other vendor's? All of the peripherals function the same, for each vendors'? Come on, get real!
That's all in the two weeks. From working code to working code. We just did it from a TI to Freescale SoC.
...yet you claim that you can do that all between X and A without even looking at the code. Unbelievable!
I call bullshit when I see bullshit and that is *BULLSHIT*.
What bullshit. There are no PCIe libraries? USB? uC? GMAFB!
Tools? TOOLS?! What do they do all by themselves?
Simulation takes TIME and SKILL that most don't have. That's in addition to the skills and time needed to do a uC or DSP solution. If there is *any* way to do a project with either, the FPGA loses. That's the whole point here; FPGAs are a solution to niches - always will be.
They do a lot and some better than other DSPs. It was an example, to counter your point. BTW, I'm not trying to say that DSPs are the end-all solution, like you are trying to, with FPGAs. ...and like I said, I've done way more FPGA design than DSP (I only do hardware).
I can't help it if you don't like being called on your bullshit. If you don't like being called on it, don't bullshit.