Does it make sense to use the above answer as a coefficient to determine the overall length of the 315 mcy antenna?
1.0838 * 7 cm = 7.5866 cm
If so, a reactance ratio can be derived to determine the number of turns on the 315 mcy antenna, no?
Danke,
--
Don, KB7RPU
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.
No linear coherence at all, it turns out. Among other things, antennas such as Schueler's are known as "loaded whips." And most, if not all, loaded whip designs originate with a September 1974 QST article. Here's the tentative governing equation, which will be fleshed out soon and published to a webpage:
formatting link
Some interesting facts were gleaned along the way to the equation:
The loading coil is the most critical part of a loaded whip antenna.
Any old length of antenna greater than ? / 2 can be used. (Ergo the cognitive dissonance in Schueler's paper, where lengths are specified to a tenth of a millimeter before the lengths are arbitrarily bent.)
The antenna's /volume/ plays an efficiency role. Ergo the diameters present in your antenna impedance calculator, for instance.
Danke,
--
Don, KB7RPU
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.