Hi:
Has it ever been done that a PC has used analog non-sampled [i.e. continuous-signal] storage on magnetic discs for RAM?
One advantage I see to this form of RAM is that once the information is lost, it is impossible to recover. Ever try recovering lost magnetic signals from an analog tape? Not gonna happen. Even with the most sophisticated techniques -- such as electron microscopy or magnetic force microscopy -- analog signals cannot be recovered once they have been erased. Digital magnetic signals persist as long as the storage media retains it's magnetic properties. For example, in order to completely and permanently eliminate the digits on an HDD platter, one needs to heat the platter beyond Curie for a sufficient amount of time -- else, those "creeps" can still recover the info even if "deleted" by the most advanced software used by DoD. If the signals on the HDD platter are purely-analog and non-sampled, it's impossible to recover once erased. Even in theory, there is absolutely no method possible to recover deleted analog data.
Let's say all the RAMs [including the main PC system memory, and the CPU-cache] are in the form of analog, continuous-signal data stored on magnetic discs similar to the HDD platters. In addition, let's say the only ROM is mask-programmed ROM -- which is obviously digital. Let's also say that the system is designed in such as way that absolutely no digital signals [even at the quantum level of physics] find there way into the magnetic platters. What would be the disadvantages?
Thanks,
Green Xenon