DC Ammeter Sensitivity Increased?

Sep 27, 2006 92 Replies

What did you have in mind, specifically?

So, even the four-year-old has to dumb it down for you?

Other way around. I need him to translate your demented babblings into something approaching human speech.

Peg Bundy: "All men are idiots. I married their king".

If it's for _your_ consumption, why bother? A few barks and a bowl of Alpo ought to keep you happy enough...

Depends not fitting snugly?

Goodbye Homer, you're really not interesting enough to bother with, but thank you for your time.

We are the champions - my friends And we'll keep on fighting - till the end - We are the champions - We are the champions No time for losers 'Cause we are the champions - of the world -

Try a higher dose of fibre.

Just dropped back in, and in response to your question, the EICO does have a pretty large filter cap in it, though I can't testify to how many of its microfarads may have grown legs and run away over the years.

However, the check I performed against my bench supply, which is definitely well filtered, confirmed the ammeter's calibration error.

I got a few giggles reading some of the interchanges on this thread I started, between "Homer J Simpson" and others.

I'm thinking that some of the participants' alimentary canals may have somehow gotten completely reversed. Medical miricals, to be sure.

Jeff

Jeffry Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE) The speed of light is 1.8*10^12 furlongs per fortnight.

Jeff Wisnia wrote in news:x9udnZ-VU- M2Cs7YnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@conversent.net:

That's been said to be even worse than it sounds. (House...)

Sounds like a case of optical rectusis - when the optic nerve gets scrambled with the nerve to the bowels.

It gives you a s***ty outlook on life. ;-)

Cheers! Rich

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required