H Bridge Revisited

As per the suggestions I received in the last thread, I have come up with a new version of my h bridge. The bridge itself can be found here:

formatting link
and the input section is here:
formatting link

I would once again appreciate any feedback you would like to offer.

Briefly the changes I made are:

  • Switching of the FETS now done through a push-pull setup. By my calculations the 68 ohm resistor should dissipate about 3/4 of a watt

  • Deadtime. I calculated the required deadtime based upon the input capacitance listed in the data sheet. I would guess the output capacitance may have been more appropriate, but chose the input as it was the larger of the two. Discharge time was calculated using RxC through the 68 ohm resistor. I then doubled that number and use it as my deadtime. I hope that was right??

Incidentally, should I drive the P chan FETS from the first inverter, rather than from the n chan FETS. I'm thinking that the p chans may stay on too long, as they will not switch off until the n chans are almost fully off?

Many thanks again

Big Matt

Reply to
Big Matt
Loading thread data ...

Hi Matt,

swap the pnp and npn transistors around, and its sweet. The current configuration will give shitloads of cross-conduction thru the npn & pnp at every switching edge because:

  1. FWD = +7.2V, Q12 off, q5 on.

  1. FWD falls below 6.6V or so, Q12 turns on, Q5 still on

  2. FWD falls below 0.6V or so, Q12 still on, Q5 starts to think about turning off

  1. after Tstorage + Tfall, Q5 finally gets around to turning off.

If you swap the pnps and npns, they end up common-collector (cuyrrent gain but no voltage gain, exactly what you want) and the cross-conduction goes away. You might then want to remove U2C,E as the emitter-followers do not invert.

but that looks good. the edge delays are spot on.

R3 and R4 can connect to REV and FWD, at the moment the inverting npn/pnp combo screws up your logic. So the npns and pnps must just be drawn in thw wrong place - graphical typo (grypo?)

dont forget a decent cap across the +7.2V supply. A big one, and a nice small one for the high frequencies....

Cheers Terry

Reply to
Terry Given

Thanks Terry.

Reply to
Big Matt

No worries. post some pics when you've built one :)

Reply to
Terry Given

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.