That woud require a current limiting architecture. Unfortunately the datasheet doesn't say.
That could also mean "do not exceed". Too dicey.
That woud require a current limiting architecture. Unfortunately the datasheet doesn't say.
That could also mean "do not exceed". Too dicey.
-- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
But dicey, especially considering the other experience you and others had. If I fry those things it would not be cool at all because this job is about finding a smoking gun. Not to blame anyone but to figure out how we can prevent such system failures in the future.
-- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Can't do it. Especially since I have to find out why these systems failed so I need to test "as is".
However, then the uC and other stuff on the rail will be compromised in their function.
-- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Or two diodes in series. That is a good idea. I only need to cross the logic threshold on teh other device and even with Schmitt that shouldn't require anything much closer than 1/3rd towards either rail.
-- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
No, that is clearly not what it means. When they say VOH =0V they mean exactly that. How would you limit the current while holding the pin at a given voltage???
You need to stop being paranoid and learn to read the data sheet. That said, they don't indicate the max current for the VOL = VDD for the high drive pins on page 35. So for those few pins you don't have data.
Rick C.
+- Get 6 months of free supercharging +- Tesla referral code -ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.