Product Evaluation HA !

What tolerate were these? From the armchair perspective, the lack of

What are some other real life tests folks use to qualify components outside of the standard boring stuff on a datasheet? For example an assembled board can pass all tests, but still have terrible solder quality and to my knowledge there isn't really a scoring or rating system for the quality of final assembly.

Does anybody tug on leads anymore, or bend them to see if they break or still solder? How often are there "surprise" lots of components that completely suck?

========================= =============

es. Little brown things.

Those are 0.1% tolerance parts.

Any error is in your METER !!!

es,

a thermal characteristic test. Taking an average specimen and clipping it to the measuring device was adequate and then I put my butane lighter under it. Now I figure a Zippo is less suitable for this because of it having mo re hydrocarbons in the flue.

Aren't you ?

This Loon is straight from the Loonie bin.

..... Phil

==============

ales. Little brown things.

okes,

t to the measuring device was adequate and then I put my butane lighter und er it. Now I figure a Zippo is less suitable for this because of it having more hydrocarbons in the flue.

There's a character in a TV show (Big Bang Theory) that you remind me of. Like that character (Sheldon), you also seem to have a problem with sarcasm or hyperbole unless it's accompanied by a smiley face emoji.

You are far too kind!

I'm just a sweetheart down deep.

You would have thought that OHM (off his meds) Phil would have caught on to Jeff's sarcasm when Jeff summed up the evaluation of the resistor's tight value readings and temperature torture resistance with "I think it passed" - the quotes being Jeff's...

No, it is not. This is compared to two other good meters, one a Fluke 8842, and one of them was calibrated to NIST a couple of years ago.

No other resistors on near that range read 0.1% high.

But you grab on to anything to dig on someone so, so be it.