Tubes (Nixies) Wanted: CD47, GR-414, GR-727, GR-628, GR1620, CD27, B-7971, B-8971

Tubes wanted, in any quantity and condition. I am looking for gas discharge display-tubes (nixies) as listed above. The tubes I am especially interested in are:

- CD47, GR-414, GR-727, GR-628, GR1620, CD27: giant tubes from Okaya in Japan

- B-7971, B-8971 or other alphanumeric indicator tubes from Burroughs, USA

- Z568M, Z5680: huge tubes from RFT, East Germany.

I am also interested in any other display tubes/nixies. If you possess some, you are more than welcome to offer a price. My email address is found here (anti spam):

formatting link

Regards, Jens

Reply to
webmaster
Loading thread data ...

webmaster@ jb-electronics.de

For someone concerned about INCOMING spam, you sure don't seem too worried about PRODUCING it.

formatting link
formatting link
*-*+only-advertise+sci.electronics.equipment-Test-lab-*-*-*-*+already.available.solutions+the.rec.hierarchy+*.*.not.a.forsale.group+zz-zz+Discussion

You would at least appear to be LESS of an asshole if you wouldn't MULTI-POST.

formatting link
*-*-*-marked-as-Read-in-ALL-*-groups+Newsgroups.line

Reply to
JeffM

it.http://groups.google.com/groups/search?enc_author=LCHEYBsAAACd93eLdf7...http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics/msg/13651a897337a7a9?q...

MULTI-POST.http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:qHhBKJ-sXKYJ:en.wikipedia.org/wi...

Hey, there is no need to become insulting. I am new to these news- groups. Obviously I did not know exactly where to post it. And there is definetely no reason at all to welcome a new member with talk like that.

I apologise for the multiple posts, but I am not so familiar with these groups.

Regards, Jens

Reply to
JensB

webmaster@ jb-electronics.de

JeffM wrote:

JensB wrote:

It's so typical of a SPAMMER to become offended when someone steps on HIS dainty sensibilities.

In life, I find that preparation is 90% of the game. A little research pays BIG dividends

formatting link
formatting link

Even "Google Groups" has a page on this:

formatting link
?answer=46492+don't-use-Usenet-as-an-advertising-medium+Usenet+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-telemarketer+multiple.newsgroups+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-separately+inappropriate.commercial.messages+2006+spamming

...and it is typical of online posting venues to have a charter or a guidelines page:

formatting link
*-*+only-advertise+sci.electronics.equipment-Test-lab-*-*-*-*+already.available.solutions+the.rec.hierarchy+*.*.not.a.forsale.group+zz-zz+Discussion ...but SPAMMERS don't get caught up in such details.

OK. Go away and don't come back. One less SPAMMER? Sounds good to me.

Reply to
JeffM

dividends

formatting link
?num=100&q=Netiquette+Guide

this:

formatting link

page:

formatting link

Dear Jeff,

You are right, definetely, preperation would have prevented this. I admit this and apologise for it.

But one thing I have to say. I'm actually sad, that in a newsgroup - originally designed for help amongs fellow electronic hobbyists - I have to come across such needless verbal offences. Even if someone does something wrong, is it each and everyone's right do affront somebody to be an "a**hole"? That's a little childish, don't you think? We're all grownups here, hm? Do you really think this is necessary?

Regards, Jens

Reply to
JensB

They were not created for 'hobbyist', but for people who work in electronics. This newsgroup is about test equipment, manuals for test equipment, and help locating parts or whole pieces of equipment. Hobbyists are welcome, as long as they play by the rules:

This is not a "For sale" newsgroup. Any electronics related sale messages belong on or

for Google users.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

OK, I didn't know that. By informing myself beforehand I could have known this, though.

Regards, Jens

Reply to
JensB

The OP was looking for parts, not selling them. I don't have a problem with that.

Reply to
JW

This is not the right newsgroup though, and he posted it all over the place like he was using a splatter gun. All I'm trying to do is show the right way to find what he wants.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

Well, maybe the >>This is not a "For sale" newsgroup.

Yup.

JW wrote:

Let's recap:

This is obviously a *commercial* effort. In pursuit of that, the OP is trying to leverage what he sees as *free ads on Usenet*. This is NOT in the spirit of ANY of the groups to which he posted this.

formatting link

There is a group set up *specifically* for commercial traffic. It is listed in the Charter (to which I linked) and Mike posted the direct link. Here it is again: news:misc.industry.electronics.marketplace

formatting link
. .

I do. If the OP is going to use the *splatter* approach (excellent word, Mike), he needs to become aware of the consequences of his actions and how to make them as benign as possible FOR OTHERS. (The *marked as read* paradigm was noted in the Wikipedia article to which I linked.)[1]

If he is going to continue to spew THE SAME THING to MULTIPLE GROUPS (if, and only if, those posts are less overtly COMMERCIAL in nature), he needs to get a proper newsreader

formatting link
*-Gravity+Xnews+Pan+trademark+Disclaimers+last.modified+*-Agent+nonprofit+Thunderbird (Google limits you 5 cross-posts) and a proper NNTP provider.
formatting link

My take on this is that, outside of his narrow self-interest (profit), the OP has no interest in the Usenet community and (like so many Usenet abusers who are wannabe businessmen), he doesn't recognize that legitimate vendors know that advertising is a cost of business--just like rent and utilities. . . [1] I am one of the MANY who has bitched about (and to) Google about their lack of responsible stewardship as an NNTP provider.

formatting link
*-rules+*-a-service-for-*-*-*-*+hide-the-fact-*-*-*-they-are-*-on-Usenet+concerns-*-*-*-*-about-the-Google-interface+what.is.wrong+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-is-now-legendary+*-*-savvy+Google-cannot-muster-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+*-*-policed&strip=1#Web_interfaces

If they would simply make this

formatting link
?answer=46492+don't-use-Usenet-as-an-advertising-medium+Usenet+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-telemarketer+2006+be.interested+inappropriate-commercial-messages into a click-thru page that people have to acknowledge

**before** their initial access to posting privileges, I think things would improve significantly.

OTOH, Google's limp-wristed approach to obvious spammers who *already* have access is going to take a **real** commitment and (as the wiki article hints at) before that improves, the guy in charge there is going to have to grow a pair.

Reply to
JeffM

I'm sorry to destroy your imaginations, but I'm not a businessman whatsoever. I'm just interested in these tubes and would like to collect different types. That's why I wrote "in any quiantity or condition". I'm interested in single tubes (maybe even defective) as well as in many tubes (lots of 50 or more) to build some clocks. I apologise if I haven't made this clear enough.

news:misc.industry.electronics.marketplacehttp://groups.google.com/group/news:misc.industry.electronics.marketp...

newsreader

formatting link

provider.http://www.google.com/search?q=news-servers+GigaNews+TeraNews

Again, I have to remind you that I'm not a businessman but a private person...

provider.http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:3uMiDBcerS8J:en.wikilib.com/wiki...

this

formatting link

Dear Jeff,

I think a misunderstanding is the root of this discussion we're having now. I am no businessman (as stated above) whatsoever, just a private person trying to collect some tubes.

I don't know how much times I have told you that I did not know these groups were linked so I obviously didn't want to multipost or "use the splatter-methode"...

Regards, Jens

Reply to
JensB

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.