1. Home
  2. Embedded Programming
  3. Stepper motor interfaces

Stepper motor interfaces

Greetings, I'm looking at an under-hood stepper motor interface application, however I don't know the full specs of the system yet. In particular, I'm assuming there are 2 basic approaches one invlovling the micro provide the actual stepper pulses, and another where a dedicated chip recieves commands from the micro, and off-loads the micro of the step pulses.

Can someone point me to a good stable source for such stepper interface chips, and perhaps tell me a little about their experience with them?

TIA,

-D

Reply to
Mr_D
Loading thread data ...

The stepper pulses are relatively slow. You should be able to do it with one micro.

Reply to
linnix

There are several considerations.

If you have a unipolar motor, and want to do full stepping, using a very simple micro and n-channel MOSFETS provides a workable system.

If you have a bipolar motor, you need a bridge to drive it, and such a config argues more for a dedicated driver chip.

If you want to do microstepping, that argues even more for a dedicated driver chip.

formatting link
- Have not used these, but they look very good.

Reply to
Bryan Hackney

Depends a lot on the exact type of motor you're driving. Unipolar or bipolar, what current, what voltage, etc.

I've created several projects with the 3967 from Allegro:

formatting link

This is a driver chip for bipolar motors, full H-bridge, current regulators and microstepping. Driving the chip is easy : one pin for the clock for each (micro)step and one pin for the direction. It needs a few resistors and capacitors for the PWM current regulators. Be sure to provide proper thermal connections to your PCB for cooling. (I know what I'm talking about, I fried a few)

--
:wq
^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C
Reply to
Ico

That's true, but the software and testing effort needed to get optimum performance from a particular motor can be expensive. You need to have your program control acceleration curves, watch out for resonance frequencies and a number of other functions. You still have do the tests and make the decisions with a motor controller, but you don't have to write and debug the code that implements the functions.

If you have the micro do the pulses, you are adding a somewhat demanding real-time task to the chores your micro must perform.

Mark Borgerson

Reply to
Mark Borgerson

[...]

I have a guess that with sufficiently small microstepping, the torque- frequency curve flattens out, and the resonant problems disappear. Smoothly commutated brushless DC motors (BLDC) have no problems with resonance. The smoother the microstep, the more the stepper motor resembles a 3 phase BLDC.

This feature alone is a strong argument for microstepping - one that had not occured to me before.

Aside : brushless DC motors should really be called brushless AC motors.

[...]
Reply to
Bryan Hackney

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.