Those TDK datasheets should have a power density graph of dissipation
>density versus frequency with flux density peak variation as a
>parameter, you are interested in the ac-component of flux density. This
>dissipation results from the energy required to force the material
>through its hysteresis loop and is nonlinear with frequency or the rate
>at which you flip the polarity of the magnetization. The 2500 Gauss
>sounds more like a DC saturation flux density for the material, at
>100KHz, you may have to back this off to 1000 Gauss or less. The DC flux
>bias also sets a limitation on your ac-component of flux but does not
>directly contribute to power loss and heating. And you're right, you
>have to use the equations you mention relating flux to voltage,
>frequency, and effective cross-sectional area, this is your starting
>point for estimating the magnitudes you need to size the core.
I think Reggie is working on a flyback with incomplete energy transfer.
The 'peak' flux density could greatly exceed deltaB.
RL