>>> If an electromagnet is thermally limited, and you plan to fill the
>>>> available winding window, I think it doesn't matter what size wire you
>>>> use. So size the wire to match whatever power supply you have, to get
>>>> as many watts into the coil as it can stand.
>>>>
>>>> It's like a transformer. A 100 VA transformer is the same size whether
>>>> it has a 120 volt primary, a 240 volt primary, or a dual primary.
>>>
>>> A persuasive argument but would it not be the case that if you wound
>>> with wire half the diameter of #10 say #16 that there would be 400
>>> turns with .16 ohms resistance (both four times as much as with #10)
>>> but half as much current for the same power level since 25*25*.16 = 100
>>> so there are 10000 ampere turns which is twice as much as before.
>>
>> Prove to me that 400 turns of #16 is the same length of wire as 100
>> turns
>> of #10 wire. Assume a 1" diameter core and 2" length.
>> I've looked for an online calculator, no luck so far.
>
> Yes by mistake I left out a factor of four due to length
> 400 turns would be about 4 times as long so that factor and
> the factor of 4 from half-diameter would give .64 ohms
> resistance rather than .16 ohms so now the calculation is
> 12.5A*12.5A*0.64ohms = 100W and 5000 ampere turns which is
> the same as with #10 wire.
>
I think it's much worse than that. I used Reg Edwards (SK) program at
400 turns of 16 gauge wire is 470 ft of wire @ .004 ohms/ft = 1.88 ohms 100 turns of 10 gauge wire id 117.5 ft of wire @.001 ohms/ft = .117 ohms
So; the current ratio will be 16 to 1. Therefore 16 x 100turns = 1600 or for #16 wire 1 x 400turns =400 The amp/turns is 4 time higher for the # 10 vs. # 16 I got lazy and short on time, so I may not have explained this well. Let me know if it doesn't make sense. Mike