On a sunny day (Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:43:26 -0700) it happened Don Y
> snipped-for-privacy@foo.invalid wrote in <vfk2bp$3ueps$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:
>
>>No, not that AI is going to take your job ("render you redundant") but,
>>rather, that it is going to be relied upon for information that is
>>provably incorrect:
>>
>>formatting link>>
>>it seems the most expeditious way to get these sorts of problems fixed
>>is NOT to regulate how it can be used but, rather, to hold firms using
>>it financially (criminally?) accountable for its follies...
>
> Sure, like doctors tha'st make mistakes:
>formatting link
> Does them using AI reduce errors?
> If so they could be accountable for not using it...
> Like a second opinion, always required?
>
> It is complicated..
> hacked;-)
> Power outage...
> etc etc
Anyone concerned about medical confidentiality should *never* consent to having their records held in digital form anyway. Databases holding such info are prime targets for cyberattacks, as the UK's NHS is quickly finding out.